TY - JOUR
T1 - The sequential cuing effect in speech production
AU - Sevald, Christine A.
AU - Dell, Gary S.
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported by NSF BNS 89-10596 and NIH DC-00191. The authors wish to thank Linda May and Julie Owles for their technical assistance, and Gregory Murphy, Susan Garnsey, Cindy Fisher and Gordon Logan for helpful comments on an earlier draft of this paper. We thank Herbert Schriefers and two anonymous reviewers for their comments and suggestions.
PY - 1994/11
Y1 - 1994/11
N2 - How are the sounds of words represented in plans for speech production? In Experiment 1, subjects produced sequences of four CVCs as many times as possible in 8s. We varied the number of repetitions of the initial consonant, vowel, final consonant, CV, rhyme, and whole CVC each sequence required, and measured subjects' speaking rate. Subjects produced more CVCs when the final consonant or whole word was repeated, but were slowed when only initial sounds or CVs were repeated. Two other experiments replicate the location-based effects and extended them to bisyllabic words. We attribute the locational effects to competition between words that are formally similar, and specifically, to competition between discrepant phonemes in the two words to occupy a particular wordframe position. The fact that only discrepant initial, but not final sounds slow production suggests that phonemes are activated sequentially, from left to right.
AB - How are the sounds of words represented in plans for speech production? In Experiment 1, subjects produced sequences of four CVCs as many times as possible in 8s. We varied the number of repetitions of the initial consonant, vowel, final consonant, CV, rhyme, and whole CVC each sequence required, and measured subjects' speaking rate. Subjects produced more CVCs when the final consonant or whole word was repeated, but were slowed when only initial sounds or CVs were repeated. Two other experiments replicate the location-based effects and extended them to bisyllabic words. We attribute the locational effects to competition between words that are formally similar, and specifically, to competition between discrepant phonemes in the two words to occupy a particular wordframe position. The fact that only discrepant initial, but not final sounds slow production suggests that phonemes are activated sequentially, from left to right.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028541159&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028541159&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/0010-0277(94)90067-1
DO - 10.1016/0010-0277(94)90067-1
M3 - Article
C2 - 7805353
AN - SCOPUS:0028541159
SN - 0010-0277
VL - 53
SP - 91
EP - 127
JO - Cognition
JF - Cognition
IS - 2
ER -