The Secret Life of Patents

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This symposium essay challenges the claim that trade secret law can and should play an increased role in safeguarding intellectual property today. In our view, although trade secret law will continue to be useful in certain circumstances, it remains - and should remain - of limited significance. This is for two reasons. First, as a practical matter, the digital age makes trade secrets more vulnerable. It facilitates disclosure by demolishing barriers that once prevented access to and sharing of information. Likewise, the digital age also makes disclosure more costly. In the past, a leak could be contained. Today, mass disclosure, an irreversible loss, is just an e-mail away. Second, from a policy perspective, greater reliance on trade secrets presents the risk of overreaching; that is, the use of the law to claim protections beyond those the law actually confers. Overreaching, a problem found increasingly in other areas of intellectual property law, upsets the balance between intellectual property rights and the public domain. In arguing against the proposal for increased reliance on trade secrets, this article draws lessons from current trends in copyright law. Specifically, owners of creative works who are dissatisfied with the protections that copyright law confers are increasingly turning to contract law to augment their rights and claim protections beyond those that copyright law itself provides. These actions undermine the public domain. The experience of using contract law to augment copyright law highlights similar public costs that may result from aggressive use of trade secret law to augment patent protections. A diminished role for trade secrets, which is likely in the digital age, would therefore be a welcome development. More generally, trade secret law is not on par with patent law. Federal law expresses a clear preference for the inventor who discloses an invention to the public and obtains a patent over the inventor who keeps the invention a secret. State trade secret law must not undermine the policy of disclosure that Congress has adopted.
Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)33-65
Number of pages33
JournalWashburn law journal
Volume48
Issue number1
StatePublished - 2008

Fingerprint

Patents
Disclosure
Intellectual Property
Inventors
Public Sector
Access to Information
Ownership
Postal Service
Contracts
Costs and Cost Analysis

Keywords

  • Patents
  • Trade secrets
  • overreaching
  • patent reform
  • trade secret law
  • digital age
  • espionage
  • theft
  • leaks

Cite this

The Secret Life of Patents. / Mazzone, Jason.

In: Washburn law journal, Vol. 48, No. 1, 2008, p. 33-65.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mazzone, J 2008, 'The Secret Life of Patents', Washburn law journal, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 33-65.
Mazzone, Jason. / The Secret Life of Patents. In: Washburn law journal. 2008 ; Vol. 48, No. 1. pp. 33-65.
@article{d7a452c029204e50ba071b8c15bb5256,
title = "The Secret Life of Patents",
abstract = "This symposium essay challenges the claim that trade secret law can and should play an increased role in safeguarding intellectual property today. In our view, although trade secret law will continue to be useful in certain circumstances, it remains - and should remain - of limited significance. This is for two reasons. First, as a practical matter, the digital age makes trade secrets more vulnerable. It facilitates disclosure by demolishing barriers that once prevented access to and sharing of information. Likewise, the digital age also makes disclosure more costly. In the past, a leak could be contained. Today, mass disclosure, an irreversible loss, is just an e-mail away. Second, from a policy perspective, greater reliance on trade secrets presents the risk of overreaching; that is, the use of the law to claim protections beyond those the law actually confers. Overreaching, a problem found increasingly in other areas of intellectual property law, upsets the balance between intellectual property rights and the public domain. In arguing against the proposal for increased reliance on trade secrets, this article draws lessons from current trends in copyright law. Specifically, owners of creative works who are dissatisfied with the protections that copyright law confers are increasingly turning to contract law to augment their rights and claim protections beyond those that copyright law itself provides. These actions undermine the public domain. The experience of using contract law to augment copyright law highlights similar public costs that may result from aggressive use of trade secret law to augment patent protections. A diminished role for trade secrets, which is likely in the digital age, would therefore be a welcome development. More generally, trade secret law is not on par with patent law. Federal law expresses a clear preference for the inventor who discloses an invention to the public and obtains a patent over the inventor who keeps the invention a secret. State trade secret law must not undermine the policy of disclosure that Congress has adopted.",
keywords = "Patents, Trade secrets, overreaching, patent reform, trade secret law, digital age, espionage, theft, leaks",
author = "Jason Mazzone",
year = "2008",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "48",
pages = "33--65",
journal = "Washburn law journal",
issn = "0043-0420",
publisher = "Washbum University",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Secret Life of Patents

AU - Mazzone, Jason

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - This symposium essay challenges the claim that trade secret law can and should play an increased role in safeguarding intellectual property today. In our view, although trade secret law will continue to be useful in certain circumstances, it remains - and should remain - of limited significance. This is for two reasons. First, as a practical matter, the digital age makes trade secrets more vulnerable. It facilitates disclosure by demolishing barriers that once prevented access to and sharing of information. Likewise, the digital age also makes disclosure more costly. In the past, a leak could be contained. Today, mass disclosure, an irreversible loss, is just an e-mail away. Second, from a policy perspective, greater reliance on trade secrets presents the risk of overreaching; that is, the use of the law to claim protections beyond those the law actually confers. Overreaching, a problem found increasingly in other areas of intellectual property law, upsets the balance between intellectual property rights and the public domain. In arguing against the proposal for increased reliance on trade secrets, this article draws lessons from current trends in copyright law. Specifically, owners of creative works who are dissatisfied with the protections that copyright law confers are increasingly turning to contract law to augment their rights and claim protections beyond those that copyright law itself provides. These actions undermine the public domain. The experience of using contract law to augment copyright law highlights similar public costs that may result from aggressive use of trade secret law to augment patent protections. A diminished role for trade secrets, which is likely in the digital age, would therefore be a welcome development. More generally, trade secret law is not on par with patent law. Federal law expresses a clear preference for the inventor who discloses an invention to the public and obtains a patent over the inventor who keeps the invention a secret. State trade secret law must not undermine the policy of disclosure that Congress has adopted.

AB - This symposium essay challenges the claim that trade secret law can and should play an increased role in safeguarding intellectual property today. In our view, although trade secret law will continue to be useful in certain circumstances, it remains - and should remain - of limited significance. This is for two reasons. First, as a practical matter, the digital age makes trade secrets more vulnerable. It facilitates disclosure by demolishing barriers that once prevented access to and sharing of information. Likewise, the digital age also makes disclosure more costly. In the past, a leak could be contained. Today, mass disclosure, an irreversible loss, is just an e-mail away. Second, from a policy perspective, greater reliance on trade secrets presents the risk of overreaching; that is, the use of the law to claim protections beyond those the law actually confers. Overreaching, a problem found increasingly in other areas of intellectual property law, upsets the balance between intellectual property rights and the public domain. In arguing against the proposal for increased reliance on trade secrets, this article draws lessons from current trends in copyright law. Specifically, owners of creative works who are dissatisfied with the protections that copyright law confers are increasingly turning to contract law to augment their rights and claim protections beyond those that copyright law itself provides. These actions undermine the public domain. The experience of using contract law to augment copyright law highlights similar public costs that may result from aggressive use of trade secret law to augment patent protections. A diminished role for trade secrets, which is likely in the digital age, would therefore be a welcome development. More generally, trade secret law is not on par with patent law. Federal law expresses a clear preference for the inventor who discloses an invention to the public and obtains a patent over the inventor who keeps the invention a secret. State trade secret law must not undermine the policy of disclosure that Congress has adopted.

KW - Patents

KW - Trade secrets

KW - overreaching

KW - patent reform

KW - trade secret law

KW - digital age

KW - espionage

KW - theft

KW - leaks

M3 - Article

VL - 48

SP - 33

EP - 65

JO - Washburn law journal

JF - Washburn law journal

SN - 0043-0420

IS - 1

ER -