The role of crowding in parallel search

Peripheral pooling is not responsible for logarithmic efficiency in parallel search

Anna Madison, Alejandro Lleras, Simona Buetti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Recent results from our laboratory showed that, in fixed-target parallel search tasks, reaction times increase in a logarithmic fashion with set size, and the slope of this logarithmic function is modulated by lure-target similarity. These results were interpreted as being consistent with a processing architecture where early vision (stage one) processes elements in the display in exhaustive fashion with unlimited capacity and with a limitation in resolution. Here, we evaluate the contribution of crowding to our recent logarithmic search slope findings, considering the possibility that peripheral pooling of features (as observed in crowding) may be responsible for logarithmic efficiency. Factors known to affect the strength of crowding were varied, specifically: item spacing and similarity. The results from three experiments converge on the same pattern of results: reaction times increased logarithmically with set size and were modulated by lure-target similarity even when crowding was minimized within displays through an inter-item spacing manipulation. Furthermore, we found logarithmic search efficiencies were overall improved in displays where crowding was minimized compared to displays where crowding was possible. The findings from these three experiments suggest logarithmic efficiency in efficient search is not the result peripheral pooling of features. That said, the presence of crowding does tend to reduce search efficiency, even in “pop-out” search situations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)352-373
Number of pages22
JournalAttention, Perception, and Psychophysics
Volume80
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2018

Fingerprint

Crowding
efficiency
experiment
Reaction Time
manipulation
time

Keywords

  • Crowding
  • Parallel processing
  • Parallel search
  • Pop-out
  • Visual search

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Sensory Systems
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

The role of crowding in parallel search : Peripheral pooling is not responsible for logarithmic efficiency in parallel search. / Madison, Anna; Lleras, Alejandro; Buetti, Simona.

In: Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, Vol. 80, No. 2, 01.02.2018, p. 352-373.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7a2a050b787e4a4a8518966d59309a3c,
title = "The role of crowding in parallel search: Peripheral pooling is not responsible for logarithmic efficiency in parallel search",
abstract = "Recent results from our laboratory showed that, in fixed-target parallel search tasks, reaction times increase in a logarithmic fashion with set size, and the slope of this logarithmic function is modulated by lure-target similarity. These results were interpreted as being consistent with a processing architecture where early vision (stage one) processes elements in the display in exhaustive fashion with unlimited capacity and with a limitation in resolution. Here, we evaluate the contribution of crowding to our recent logarithmic search slope findings, considering the possibility that peripheral pooling of features (as observed in crowding) may be responsible for logarithmic efficiency. Factors known to affect the strength of crowding were varied, specifically: item spacing and similarity. The results from three experiments converge on the same pattern of results: reaction times increased logarithmically with set size and were modulated by lure-target similarity even when crowding was minimized within displays through an inter-item spacing manipulation. Furthermore, we found logarithmic search efficiencies were overall improved in displays where crowding was minimized compared to displays where crowding was possible. The findings from these three experiments suggest logarithmic efficiency in efficient search is not the result peripheral pooling of features. That said, the presence of crowding does tend to reduce search efficiency, even in “pop-out” search situations.",
keywords = "Crowding, Parallel processing, Parallel search, Pop-out, Visual search",
author = "Anna Madison and Alejandro Lleras and Simona Buetti",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3758/s13414-017-1441-3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "80",
pages = "352--373",
journal = "Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics",
issn = "1943-3921",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The role of crowding in parallel search

T2 - Peripheral pooling is not responsible for logarithmic efficiency in parallel search

AU - Madison, Anna

AU - Lleras, Alejandro

AU - Buetti, Simona

PY - 2018/2/1

Y1 - 2018/2/1

N2 - Recent results from our laboratory showed that, in fixed-target parallel search tasks, reaction times increase in a logarithmic fashion with set size, and the slope of this logarithmic function is modulated by lure-target similarity. These results were interpreted as being consistent with a processing architecture where early vision (stage one) processes elements in the display in exhaustive fashion with unlimited capacity and with a limitation in resolution. Here, we evaluate the contribution of crowding to our recent logarithmic search slope findings, considering the possibility that peripheral pooling of features (as observed in crowding) may be responsible for logarithmic efficiency. Factors known to affect the strength of crowding were varied, specifically: item spacing and similarity. The results from three experiments converge on the same pattern of results: reaction times increased logarithmically with set size and were modulated by lure-target similarity even when crowding was minimized within displays through an inter-item spacing manipulation. Furthermore, we found logarithmic search efficiencies were overall improved in displays where crowding was minimized compared to displays where crowding was possible. The findings from these three experiments suggest logarithmic efficiency in efficient search is not the result peripheral pooling of features. That said, the presence of crowding does tend to reduce search efficiency, even in “pop-out” search situations.

AB - Recent results from our laboratory showed that, in fixed-target parallel search tasks, reaction times increase in a logarithmic fashion with set size, and the slope of this logarithmic function is modulated by lure-target similarity. These results were interpreted as being consistent with a processing architecture where early vision (stage one) processes elements in the display in exhaustive fashion with unlimited capacity and with a limitation in resolution. Here, we evaluate the contribution of crowding to our recent logarithmic search slope findings, considering the possibility that peripheral pooling of features (as observed in crowding) may be responsible for logarithmic efficiency. Factors known to affect the strength of crowding were varied, specifically: item spacing and similarity. The results from three experiments converge on the same pattern of results: reaction times increased logarithmically with set size and were modulated by lure-target similarity even when crowding was minimized within displays through an inter-item spacing manipulation. Furthermore, we found logarithmic search efficiencies were overall improved in displays where crowding was minimized compared to displays where crowding was possible. The findings from these three experiments suggest logarithmic efficiency in efficient search is not the result peripheral pooling of features. That said, the presence of crowding does tend to reduce search efficiency, even in “pop-out” search situations.

KW - Crowding

KW - Parallel processing

KW - Parallel search

KW - Pop-out

KW - Visual search

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85034059787&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85034059787&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3758/s13414-017-1441-3

DO - 10.3758/s13414-017-1441-3

M3 - Article

VL - 80

SP - 352

EP - 373

JO - Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

JF - Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

SN - 1943-3921

IS - 2

ER -