The role of computational models in neuropsychological investigations of language: Reply to Ruml and Caramazza (2000)

Gary S. Dell, Nadine Martin, Eleanor M. Saffran, Myrna F. Schwartz, Deborah A. Gagnon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

W. Ruml and A. Caramazza's (2000) analysis of the model of normal and aphasie lexical access proposed by G. S. Dell, M. F. Schwartz, N. Martin, E. M. Saffran, and D. A. Gagnon (1997) is completely at odds with current practice concerning the use of models in psychology. An evaluation of Dell et al.'s original claims using Ruml and Caramazza's model parameters sustains these claims in all respects.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)635-645
Number of pages11
JournalPsychological review
Volume107
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2000

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The role of computational models in neuropsychological investigations of language: Reply to Ruml and Caramazza (2000)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this