TY - JOUR
T1 - The representation of sentences in memory
AU - Goetz, Ernest T.
AU - Anderson, Richard C.
AU - Schallert, Diane L.
N1 - Funding Information:
The research reported herein was supported in part by the National Institute of Education under Contract No US-NIE-C-400-76-0116. The authors wish to express their thanks to Claire Lieberman who assisted in developing the materials used in Experiment IA and B and in running the subjects and scoring the data. The assistance of Mark Anderson and Michael Rivera is also gratefully acknowledged. A version of this paper was presented at the meetings of the Psychonomic Society, San Antonio, 1978. Dr. Goetz is now located at Texas A & M University and Dr. Schallert is at the University of Texas. Requests for reprints should be addressed to Dr. Ernest T. Goetz, Department of Educational Psychology, Texas A & M L3niversity, College Station, Tex. 77843.
PY - 1981/8
Y1 - 1981/8
N2 - Associative theory characterizes the memorial representation of a sentence as a collection of independently linked concepts. In contrast, Gestalt theory says that the representation underlying each proposition expressed in a sentence is an integral unit. An analysis shows that the results of previous research either have been equivocal or have supported the Gestalt position. Three new studies are reported that show that, when scored for gist, the propositions underlying simple three-word sentences are recalled completely or not at all. A final experiment indicates that one-proposition sentences containing four content words are more likely to be recalled as a whole than three-proposition sentences of the same length, and that fragmentary recall of the three-proposition sentences usually preserves the unity of constituent propositions. These results strongly support the Gestalt position over any associative model that has been proposed.
AB - Associative theory characterizes the memorial representation of a sentence as a collection of independently linked concepts. In contrast, Gestalt theory says that the representation underlying each proposition expressed in a sentence is an integral unit. An analysis shows that the results of previous research either have been equivocal or have supported the Gestalt position. Three new studies are reported that show that, when scored for gist, the propositions underlying simple three-word sentences are recalled completely or not at all. A final experiment indicates that one-proposition sentences containing four content words are more likely to be recalled as a whole than three-proposition sentences of the same length, and that fragmentary recall of the three-proposition sentences usually preserves the unity of constituent propositions. These results strongly support the Gestalt position over any associative model that has been proposed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0342913512&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0342913512&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0022-5371(81)90506-5
DO - 10.1016/S0022-5371(81)90506-5
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0342913512
SN - 0022-5371
VL - 20
SP - 369
EP - 385
JO - Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior
JF - Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior
IS - 4
ER -