The Quiet Transformations of Literary Studies: What Thirteen Thousand Scholars Could Tell Us

Andrew Goldstone, Ted Underwood

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

We use quantitative methods to analyze a collection of 21,367 scholarly articles in literary studies from 1889–2013. Our approach reveals aspects of our disciplinary history that have been occluded by existing histories’ emphasis on generational and methodological conflict. We demonstrate gradual, unnoted shifts in the themes and vocabularies of scholarship—including the long rise of new subjects (like violence); we show the surprising novelty of central theoretical concepts; and we explore transformations in the shared rationales for literary scholarship that exceed the boundaries of conventional labels like “New Criticism” and “New Historicism.” Though our method uses computational tools, we not claim to provide a definitive or objective perspective on disciplinary history; instead, our approach, like the related methods of content analysis in the social sciences, allows us to pursue nuanced interpretations of the language of many texts at once.
Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)359-384
Number of pages26
JournalNew Literary History
Volume45
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2014

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Literature and Literary Theory

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The Quiet Transformations of Literary Studies: What Thirteen Thousand Scholars Could Tell Us'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this