The Psychological Foundations of Human Rights

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingEntry for encyclopedia/dictionary

Abstract

Respect for human rights requires engagement of a special capacity to identify and respond to rights, but current research on the psychological causes and conditions of human rights violations has proceeded without a clear enough understanding of the distinctive ways this psychological capacity functions. This article integrates contemporary insights from social and cognitive psychology with findings from a broader range of fields, including philosophy and evolutionary theory, to develop a contemporary account of this special capacity. The account suggests that processes of so-called “dehumanization” are not as fundamental to the generation of human rights violations as current research has suggested. Humans have an innate capacity to identify and respond to rights, but it needs support to produce stable perceptions of rights beyond one's in-group. Distinctive factors engage this capacity and can help orient it to support a more stable and universally shared form of respect for human rights in the modern world.
Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationThe Oxford handbook of international human rights law
EditorsDinah Shelton
EditionFirst edition.
StatePublished - 2013

Publication series

NameOxford Handbooks

Fingerprint

human rights
human rights violation
respect
evolutionary theory
psychology
cause
Group

Keywords

  • International law
  • Human rights
  • Rights
  • International law and human rights
  • pyschology
  • Moral psychology
  • universal moral grammar
  • in group
  • out group
  • Dehumanization
  • Mikhail
  • Chomsky
  • Rawls
  • social contract
  • cooperation
  • game theory
  • Evolutionary psychology
  • Justice
  • Globalization
  • meta-ethics
  • internal point of view
  • Hart
  • Hohfeld

Cite this

Kar, R. B. (2013). The Psychological Foundations of Human Rights. In D. Shelton (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of international human rights law (First edition. ed.). (Oxford Handbooks).

The Psychological Foundations of Human Rights. / Kar, Robin B.

The Oxford handbook of international human rights law. ed. / Dinah Shelton. First edition. ed. 2013. (Oxford Handbooks).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingEntry for encyclopedia/dictionary

Kar, RB 2013, The Psychological Foundations of Human Rights. in D Shelton (ed.), The Oxford handbook of international human rights law. First edition. edn, Oxford Handbooks.
Kar RB. The Psychological Foundations of Human Rights. In Shelton D, editor, The Oxford handbook of international human rights law. First edition. ed. 2013. (Oxford Handbooks).
Kar, Robin B. / The Psychological Foundations of Human Rights. The Oxford handbook of international human rights law. editor / Dinah Shelton. First edition. ed. 2013. (Oxford Handbooks).
@inbook{aebc73bcb878478c9e14db245ea30f12,
title = "The Psychological Foundations of Human Rights",
abstract = "Respect for human rights requires engagement of a special capacity to identify and respond to rights, but current research on the psychological causes and conditions of human rights violations has proceeded without a clear enough understanding of the distinctive ways this psychological capacity functions. This article integrates contemporary insights from social and cognitive psychology with findings from a broader range of fields, including philosophy and evolutionary theory, to develop a contemporary account of this special capacity. The account suggests that processes of so-called “dehumanization” are not as fundamental to the generation of human rights violations as current research has suggested. Humans have an innate capacity to identify and respond to rights, but it needs support to produce stable perceptions of rights beyond one's in-group. Distinctive factors engage this capacity and can help orient it to support a more stable and universally shared form of respect for human rights in the modern world.",
keywords = "International law, Human rights, Rights, International law and human rights, pyschology, Moral psychology, universal moral grammar, in group, out group, Dehumanization, Mikhail, Chomsky, Rawls, social contract, cooperation, game theory, Evolutionary psychology, Justice, Globalization, meta-ethics, internal point of view, Hart, Hohfeld",
author = "Kar, {Robin B}",
note = "Includes bibliographical references and index",
year = "2013",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "0199640130",
series = "Oxford Handbooks",
editor = "Dinah Shelton",
booktitle = "The Oxford handbook of international human rights law",
edition = "First edition.",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - The Psychological Foundations of Human Rights

AU - Kar, Robin B

N1 - Includes bibliographical references and index

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Respect for human rights requires engagement of a special capacity to identify and respond to rights, but current research on the psychological causes and conditions of human rights violations has proceeded without a clear enough understanding of the distinctive ways this psychological capacity functions. This article integrates contemporary insights from social and cognitive psychology with findings from a broader range of fields, including philosophy and evolutionary theory, to develop a contemporary account of this special capacity. The account suggests that processes of so-called “dehumanization” are not as fundamental to the generation of human rights violations as current research has suggested. Humans have an innate capacity to identify and respond to rights, but it needs support to produce stable perceptions of rights beyond one's in-group. Distinctive factors engage this capacity and can help orient it to support a more stable and universally shared form of respect for human rights in the modern world.

AB - Respect for human rights requires engagement of a special capacity to identify and respond to rights, but current research on the psychological causes and conditions of human rights violations has proceeded without a clear enough understanding of the distinctive ways this psychological capacity functions. This article integrates contemporary insights from social and cognitive psychology with findings from a broader range of fields, including philosophy and evolutionary theory, to develop a contemporary account of this special capacity. The account suggests that processes of so-called “dehumanization” are not as fundamental to the generation of human rights violations as current research has suggested. Humans have an innate capacity to identify and respond to rights, but it needs support to produce stable perceptions of rights beyond one's in-group. Distinctive factors engage this capacity and can help orient it to support a more stable and universally shared form of respect for human rights in the modern world.

KW - International law

KW - Human rights

KW - Rights

KW - International law and human rights

KW - pyschology

KW - Moral psychology

KW - universal moral grammar

KW - in group

KW - out group

KW - Dehumanization

KW - Mikhail

KW - Chomsky

KW - Rawls

KW - social contract

KW - cooperation

KW - game theory

KW - Evolutionary psychology

KW - Justice

KW - Globalization

KW - meta-ethics

KW - internal point of view

KW - Hart

KW - Hohfeld

M3 - Entry for encyclopedia/dictionary

SN - 0199640130

SN - 9780199640133

T3 - Oxford Handbooks

BT - The Oxford handbook of international human rights law

A2 - Shelton, Dinah

ER -