The problems of Indian history

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Most historians write Indian history from a Euro-American perspective. Two great historians illustrate the problem. Francis Parkman wrote the story of the Euro-Americans' victory over the Indians. Bernard Bailyn describes the social process of settlement neutrally, but ignores the Indians. So long as scholars define the American past in this way, Indian history has no significance on its own terms. If they focus only on "intersections" of Europeans and native "obstacles," Indians are merely symbols. The many problems fall into three categories: structural, methodological, and conceptual.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)389-399
Number of pages11
JournalThe Social Science Journal
Volume25
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1988
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

historian
History
history
social process
symbol

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

The problems of Indian history. / Hoxie, Frederick E.

In: The Social Science Journal, Vol. 25, No. 4, 1988, p. 389-399.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bb01b7f412174cd7801bcf694fccbcdb,
title = "The problems of Indian history",
abstract = "Most historians write Indian history from a Euro-American perspective. Two great historians illustrate the problem. Francis Parkman wrote the story of the Euro-Americans' victory over the Indians. Bernard Bailyn describes the social process of settlement neutrally, but ignores the Indians. So long as scholars define the American past in this way, Indian history has no significance on its own terms. If they focus only on {"}intersections{"} of Europeans and native {"}obstacles,{"} Indians are merely symbols. The many problems fall into three categories: structural, methodological, and conceptual.",
author = "Hoxie, {Frederick E.}",
year = "1988",
doi = "10.1016/0362-3319(88)90020-1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "389--399",
journal = "Social Science Journal",
issn = "0362-3319",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The problems of Indian history

AU - Hoxie, Frederick E.

PY - 1988

Y1 - 1988

N2 - Most historians write Indian history from a Euro-American perspective. Two great historians illustrate the problem. Francis Parkman wrote the story of the Euro-Americans' victory over the Indians. Bernard Bailyn describes the social process of settlement neutrally, but ignores the Indians. So long as scholars define the American past in this way, Indian history has no significance on its own terms. If they focus only on "intersections" of Europeans and native "obstacles," Indians are merely symbols. The many problems fall into three categories: structural, methodological, and conceptual.

AB - Most historians write Indian history from a Euro-American perspective. Two great historians illustrate the problem. Francis Parkman wrote the story of the Euro-Americans' victory over the Indians. Bernard Bailyn describes the social process of settlement neutrally, but ignores the Indians. So long as scholars define the American past in this way, Indian history has no significance on its own terms. If they focus only on "intersections" of Europeans and native "obstacles," Indians are merely symbols. The many problems fall into three categories: structural, methodological, and conceptual.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=45549113094&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=45549113094&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0362-3319(88)90020-1

DO - 10.1016/0362-3319(88)90020-1

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:45549113094

VL - 25

SP - 389

EP - 399

JO - Social Science Journal

JF - Social Science Journal

SN - 0362-3319

IS - 4

ER -