The power of hypothesis testing in special education efficacy research

Paul T. Sindelar, Carol Allman, Lisa Ellen Monda-Amaya, Cynthia O. Vail, Cynthia L. Wilson, Patrick J. Schloss

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The efficacy of special class placement for mildly handicapped children was an early focus of special education research and has been the subject of at least two narrative reviews and one meta-analysis. In general, special class placement has proved to be no more effective than regular class placement on measures of achievement and social adjustment. However, the power with which the efficacy of special classes has been tested is unknown; thus inadequate statistical power represents an alternative explanation for the findings. The power of the statistical tests in 35 efficacy studies to detect small, medium, and large effect sizes was determined. The power to detect a medium effect size where one existed was no better than chance. However, 21 studies had adequate power to detect a large effect size. The effect sizes for these 21 studies on academic and social measures were highly variable and their averages quite small. Thus, conclusions drawn from previous reviews may be valid, in spite of the failure of earlier reviewers to consider statistical power. The implications of the present analysis for researchers, policy makers, and funding agencies are discussed in relation to the Regular Education Initiative and contemporary efficacy research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)284-296
Number of pages13
JournalThe Journal of Special Education
Volume22
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1988
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Special Education
hypothesis testing
special education
Research
Social Adjustment
Disabled Children
Administrative Personnel
Meta-Analysis
Research Personnel
Education
handicapped child
social adjustment
statistical test
Power (Psychology)
funding
narrative
education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Rehabilitation

Cite this

The power of hypothesis testing in special education efficacy research. / Sindelar, Paul T.; Allman, Carol; Monda-Amaya, Lisa Ellen; Vail, Cynthia O.; Wilson, Cynthia L.; Schloss, Patrick J.

In: The Journal of Special Education, Vol. 22, No. 3, 10.1988, p. 284-296.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sindelar, Paul T. ; Allman, Carol ; Monda-Amaya, Lisa Ellen ; Vail, Cynthia O. ; Wilson, Cynthia L. ; Schloss, Patrick J. / The power of hypothesis testing in special education efficacy research. In: The Journal of Special Education. 1988 ; Vol. 22, No. 3. pp. 284-296.
@article{5d6b69b49986450292747261b3c61149,
title = "The power of hypothesis testing in special education efficacy research",
abstract = "The efficacy of special class placement for mildly handicapped children was an early focus of special education research and has been the subject of at least two narrative reviews and one meta-analysis. In general, special class placement has proved to be no more effective than regular class placement on measures of achievement and social adjustment. However, the power with which the efficacy of special classes has been tested is unknown; thus inadequate statistical power represents an alternative explanation for the findings. The power of the statistical tests in 35 efficacy studies to detect small, medium, and large effect sizes was determined. The power to detect a medium effect size where one existed was no better than chance. However, 21 studies had adequate power to detect a large effect size. The effect sizes for these 21 studies on academic and social measures were highly variable and their averages quite small. Thus, conclusions drawn from previous reviews may be valid, in spite of the failure of earlier reviewers to consider statistical power. The implications of the present analysis for researchers, policy makers, and funding agencies are discussed in relation to the Regular Education Initiative and contemporary efficacy research.",
author = "Sindelar, {Paul T.} and Carol Allman and Monda-Amaya, {Lisa Ellen} and Vail, {Cynthia O.} and Wilson, {Cynthia L.} and Schloss, {Patrick J.}",
year = "1988",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1177/002246698802200302",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "284--296",
journal = "Journal of Special Education",
issn = "0022-4669",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The power of hypothesis testing in special education efficacy research

AU - Sindelar, Paul T.

AU - Allman, Carol

AU - Monda-Amaya, Lisa Ellen

AU - Vail, Cynthia O.

AU - Wilson, Cynthia L.

AU - Schloss, Patrick J.

PY - 1988/10

Y1 - 1988/10

N2 - The efficacy of special class placement for mildly handicapped children was an early focus of special education research and has been the subject of at least two narrative reviews and one meta-analysis. In general, special class placement has proved to be no more effective than regular class placement on measures of achievement and social adjustment. However, the power with which the efficacy of special classes has been tested is unknown; thus inadequate statistical power represents an alternative explanation for the findings. The power of the statistical tests in 35 efficacy studies to detect small, medium, and large effect sizes was determined. The power to detect a medium effect size where one existed was no better than chance. However, 21 studies had adequate power to detect a large effect size. The effect sizes for these 21 studies on academic and social measures were highly variable and their averages quite small. Thus, conclusions drawn from previous reviews may be valid, in spite of the failure of earlier reviewers to consider statistical power. The implications of the present analysis for researchers, policy makers, and funding agencies are discussed in relation to the Regular Education Initiative and contemporary efficacy research.

AB - The efficacy of special class placement for mildly handicapped children was an early focus of special education research and has been the subject of at least two narrative reviews and one meta-analysis. In general, special class placement has proved to be no more effective than regular class placement on measures of achievement and social adjustment. However, the power with which the efficacy of special classes has been tested is unknown; thus inadequate statistical power represents an alternative explanation for the findings. The power of the statistical tests in 35 efficacy studies to detect small, medium, and large effect sizes was determined. The power to detect a medium effect size where one existed was no better than chance. However, 21 studies had adequate power to detect a large effect size. The effect sizes for these 21 studies on academic and social measures were highly variable and their averages quite small. Thus, conclusions drawn from previous reviews may be valid, in spite of the failure of earlier reviewers to consider statistical power. The implications of the present analysis for researchers, policy makers, and funding agencies are discussed in relation to the Regular Education Initiative and contemporary efficacy research.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84970532904&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84970532904&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/002246698802200302

DO - 10.1177/002246698802200302

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84970532904

VL - 22

SP - 284

EP - 296

JO - Journal of Special Education

JF - Journal of Special Education

SN - 0022-4669

IS - 3

ER -