The Politics of Verifying Trustworthiness in Evaluation Auditing

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Essays, opinions, and professional judgments are welcome in this section of EP. Forum articles speak to and about the philosophical and ethical dilemmas of our profession. Authors are invited to express their views to encourage constructive dialogue centered on issues. To keep the dialogue substantive, other articles motivated by previous Forum presentations should have independent titles and themes. Items labeled “Comments on…” and “Rejoinder to…” will not be published in Forum — such responses, and those not of article length or nature, are welcome and encouraged in the Letters section of EP. Standard citations and reference lists will acknowledge and identify earlier contributions and viewpoints. Manuscripts should not exceed 10 double-spaced typewritten pages in length.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)33-40
Number of pages8
JournalAmerican Journal of Evaluation
Volume10
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1989
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Manuscripts
trustworthiness
auditing
Politics
dialogue
politics
evaluation
profession
Evaluation
Auditing
Trustworthiness
Professional judgment
Nature
Ethical dilemmas
Citations

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Social Psychology
  • Health(social science)
  • Education
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

The Politics of Verifying Trustworthiness in Evaluation Auditing. / Schwandt, Thomas A.

In: American Journal of Evaluation, Vol. 10, No. 4, 11.1989, p. 33-40.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a386beceba814375861874930d07123f,
title = "The Politics of Verifying Trustworthiness in Evaluation Auditing",
abstract = "Essays, opinions, and professional judgments are welcome in this section of EP. Forum articles speak to and about the philosophical and ethical dilemmas of our profession. Authors are invited to express their views to encourage constructive dialogue centered on issues. To keep the dialogue substantive, other articles motivated by previous Forum presentations should have independent titles and themes. Items labeled “Comments on…” and “Rejoinder to…” will not be published in Forum — such responses, and those not of article length or nature, are welcome and encouraged in the Letters section of EP. Standard citations and reference lists will acknowledge and identify earlier contributions and viewpoints. Manuscripts should not exceed 10 double-spaced typewritten pages in length.",
author = "Schwandt, {Thomas A.}",
year = "1989",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1177/109821408901000405",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "33--40",
journal = "American Journal of Evaluation",
issn = "1098-2140",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Politics of Verifying Trustworthiness in Evaluation Auditing

AU - Schwandt, Thomas A.

PY - 1989/11

Y1 - 1989/11

N2 - Essays, opinions, and professional judgments are welcome in this section of EP. Forum articles speak to and about the philosophical and ethical dilemmas of our profession. Authors are invited to express their views to encourage constructive dialogue centered on issues. To keep the dialogue substantive, other articles motivated by previous Forum presentations should have independent titles and themes. Items labeled “Comments on…” and “Rejoinder to…” will not be published in Forum — such responses, and those not of article length or nature, are welcome and encouraged in the Letters section of EP. Standard citations and reference lists will acknowledge and identify earlier contributions and viewpoints. Manuscripts should not exceed 10 double-spaced typewritten pages in length.

AB - Essays, opinions, and professional judgments are welcome in this section of EP. Forum articles speak to and about the philosophical and ethical dilemmas of our profession. Authors are invited to express their views to encourage constructive dialogue centered on issues. To keep the dialogue substantive, other articles motivated by previous Forum presentations should have independent titles and themes. Items labeled “Comments on…” and “Rejoinder to…” will not be published in Forum — such responses, and those not of article length or nature, are welcome and encouraged in the Letters section of EP. Standard citations and reference lists will acknowledge and identify earlier contributions and viewpoints. Manuscripts should not exceed 10 double-spaced typewritten pages in length.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84965800098&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84965800098&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/109821408901000405

DO - 10.1177/109821408901000405

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84965800098

VL - 10

SP - 33

EP - 40

JO - American Journal of Evaluation

JF - American Journal of Evaluation

SN - 1098-2140

IS - 4

ER -