The planform mobility of river channel confluences: Insights from analysis of remotely sensed imagery

Simon J. Dixon, Gregory H. Sambrook Smith, James Leonard Best, Andrew P. Nicholas, Jon M. Bull, Mark E. Vardy, Maminul H. Sarker, Steven Goodbred

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

River channel confluences are widely acknowledged as important geomorphological nodes that control the downstream routing of water and sediment, and which are locations for the preservation of thick fluvial deposits overlying a basal scour. Despite their importance, there has been little study of the stratigraphic characteristics of river junctions, or the role of confluence morphodynamics in influencing stratigraphic character and preservation potential. As a result, although it is known that confluences can migrate through time, models of confluence geomorphology and sedimentology are usually presented from the perspective that the confluence remains at a fixed location. This is problematic for a number of reasons, not least of which is the continuing debate over whether it is possible to discriminate between scour that has been generated by autocyclic processes (such as confluence scour) and that driven by allocyclic controls (such as sea-level change). This paper investigates the spatial mobility of river confluences by using the 40-year record of Landsat Imagery to elucidate the styles, rates of change and areal extent over which large river confluence scours may migrate. On the basis of these observations, a new classification of the types of confluence scour is proposed and applied to the Amazon and Ganges-Brahmaputra-Meghna (GBM) basins. This analysis demonstrates that the drivers of confluence mobility are broadly the same as those that drive channel change more generally. Thus in the GBM basin, a high sediment supply, large variability in monsoonal driven discharge and easily erodible bank materials result in a catchment where over 80% of large confluences are mobile over this 40-year window; conversely this figure is < 40% for the Amazon basin. These results highlight that: i) the potential areal extent of confluence scours is much greater than previously assumed, with the location of some confluences on the Jamuna (Brahmaputra) River migrating over a distance of 20 times the tributary channel width; ii) extensive migration in the confluence location is more common than currently assumed, and iii) confluence mobility is often tied to the lithological and hydrological characteristics of the drainage basins that determine sediment yield.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-18
Number of pages18
JournalEarth-Science Reviews
Volume176
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2018

Fingerprint

confluence
river channel
imagery
scour
analysis
river
basin
channel change
morphodynamics
sediment yield
routing
sedimentology
drainage basin
sea level change
fluvial deposit
sediment
geomorphology
Landsat
tributary

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Earth and Planetary Sciences(all)

Cite this

The planform mobility of river channel confluences : Insights from analysis of remotely sensed imagery. / Dixon, Simon J.; Sambrook Smith, Gregory H.; Best, James Leonard; Nicholas, Andrew P.; Bull, Jon M.; Vardy, Mark E.; Sarker, Maminul H.; Goodbred, Steven.

In: Earth-Science Reviews, Vol. 176, 01.2018, p. 1-18.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Dixon, SJ, Sambrook Smith, GH, Best, JL, Nicholas, AP, Bull, JM, Vardy, ME, Sarker, MH & Goodbred, S 2018, 'The planform mobility of river channel confluences: Insights from analysis of remotely sensed imagery', Earth-Science Reviews, vol. 176, pp. 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.09.009
Dixon, Simon J. ; Sambrook Smith, Gregory H. ; Best, James Leonard ; Nicholas, Andrew P. ; Bull, Jon M. ; Vardy, Mark E. ; Sarker, Maminul H. ; Goodbred, Steven. / The planform mobility of river channel confluences : Insights from analysis of remotely sensed imagery. In: Earth-Science Reviews. 2018 ; Vol. 176. pp. 1-18.
@article{3415c41812114111838b373d30174da1,
title = "The planform mobility of river channel confluences: Insights from analysis of remotely sensed imagery",
abstract = "River channel confluences are widely acknowledged as important geomorphological nodes that control the downstream routing of water and sediment, and which are locations for the preservation of thick fluvial deposits overlying a basal scour. Despite their importance, there has been little study of the stratigraphic characteristics of river junctions, or the role of confluence morphodynamics in influencing stratigraphic character and preservation potential. As a result, although it is known that confluences can migrate through time, models of confluence geomorphology and sedimentology are usually presented from the perspective that the confluence remains at a fixed location. This is problematic for a number of reasons, not least of which is the continuing debate over whether it is possible to discriminate between scour that has been generated by autocyclic processes (such as confluence scour) and that driven by allocyclic controls (such as sea-level change). This paper investigates the spatial mobility of river confluences by using the 40-year record of Landsat Imagery to elucidate the styles, rates of change and areal extent over which large river confluence scours may migrate. On the basis of these observations, a new classification of the types of confluence scour is proposed and applied to the Amazon and Ganges-Brahmaputra-Meghna (GBM) basins. This analysis demonstrates that the drivers of confluence mobility are broadly the same as those that drive channel change more generally. Thus in the GBM basin, a high sediment supply, large variability in monsoonal driven discharge and easily erodible bank materials result in a catchment where over 80{\%} of large confluences are mobile over this 40-year window; conversely this figure is < 40{\%} for the Amazon basin. These results highlight that: i) the potential areal extent of confluence scours is much greater than previously assumed, with the location of some confluences on the Jamuna (Brahmaputra) River migrating over a distance of 20 times the tributary channel width; ii) extensive migration in the confluence location is more common than currently assumed, and iii) confluence mobility is often tied to the lithological and hydrological characteristics of the drainage basins that determine sediment yield.",
author = "Dixon, {Simon J.} and {Sambrook Smith}, {Gregory H.} and Best, {James Leonard} and Nicholas, {Andrew P.} and Bull, {Jon M.} and Vardy, {Mark E.} and Sarker, {Maminul H.} and Steven Goodbred",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.09.009",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "176",
pages = "1--18",
journal = "Earth-Science Reviews",
issn = "0012-8252",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The planform mobility of river channel confluences

T2 - Insights from analysis of remotely sensed imagery

AU - Dixon, Simon J.

AU - Sambrook Smith, Gregory H.

AU - Best, James Leonard

AU - Nicholas, Andrew P.

AU - Bull, Jon M.

AU - Vardy, Mark E.

AU - Sarker, Maminul H.

AU - Goodbred, Steven

PY - 2018/1

Y1 - 2018/1

N2 - River channel confluences are widely acknowledged as important geomorphological nodes that control the downstream routing of water and sediment, and which are locations for the preservation of thick fluvial deposits overlying a basal scour. Despite their importance, there has been little study of the stratigraphic characteristics of river junctions, or the role of confluence morphodynamics in influencing stratigraphic character and preservation potential. As a result, although it is known that confluences can migrate through time, models of confluence geomorphology and sedimentology are usually presented from the perspective that the confluence remains at a fixed location. This is problematic for a number of reasons, not least of which is the continuing debate over whether it is possible to discriminate between scour that has been generated by autocyclic processes (such as confluence scour) and that driven by allocyclic controls (such as sea-level change). This paper investigates the spatial mobility of river confluences by using the 40-year record of Landsat Imagery to elucidate the styles, rates of change and areal extent over which large river confluence scours may migrate. On the basis of these observations, a new classification of the types of confluence scour is proposed and applied to the Amazon and Ganges-Brahmaputra-Meghna (GBM) basins. This analysis demonstrates that the drivers of confluence mobility are broadly the same as those that drive channel change more generally. Thus in the GBM basin, a high sediment supply, large variability in monsoonal driven discharge and easily erodible bank materials result in a catchment where over 80% of large confluences are mobile over this 40-year window; conversely this figure is < 40% for the Amazon basin. These results highlight that: i) the potential areal extent of confluence scours is much greater than previously assumed, with the location of some confluences on the Jamuna (Brahmaputra) River migrating over a distance of 20 times the tributary channel width; ii) extensive migration in the confluence location is more common than currently assumed, and iii) confluence mobility is often tied to the lithological and hydrological characteristics of the drainage basins that determine sediment yield.

AB - River channel confluences are widely acknowledged as important geomorphological nodes that control the downstream routing of water and sediment, and which are locations for the preservation of thick fluvial deposits overlying a basal scour. Despite their importance, there has been little study of the stratigraphic characteristics of river junctions, or the role of confluence morphodynamics in influencing stratigraphic character and preservation potential. As a result, although it is known that confluences can migrate through time, models of confluence geomorphology and sedimentology are usually presented from the perspective that the confluence remains at a fixed location. This is problematic for a number of reasons, not least of which is the continuing debate over whether it is possible to discriminate between scour that has been generated by autocyclic processes (such as confluence scour) and that driven by allocyclic controls (such as sea-level change). This paper investigates the spatial mobility of river confluences by using the 40-year record of Landsat Imagery to elucidate the styles, rates of change and areal extent over which large river confluence scours may migrate. On the basis of these observations, a new classification of the types of confluence scour is proposed and applied to the Amazon and Ganges-Brahmaputra-Meghna (GBM) basins. This analysis demonstrates that the drivers of confluence mobility are broadly the same as those that drive channel change more generally. Thus in the GBM basin, a high sediment supply, large variability in monsoonal driven discharge and easily erodible bank materials result in a catchment where over 80% of large confluences are mobile over this 40-year window; conversely this figure is < 40% for the Amazon basin. These results highlight that: i) the potential areal extent of confluence scours is much greater than previously assumed, with the location of some confluences on the Jamuna (Brahmaputra) River migrating over a distance of 20 times the tributary channel width; ii) extensive migration in the confluence location is more common than currently assumed, and iii) confluence mobility is often tied to the lithological and hydrological characteristics of the drainage basins that determine sediment yield.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85033568424&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85033568424&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.09.009

DO - 10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.09.009

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85033568424

VL - 176

SP - 1

EP - 18

JO - Earth-Science Reviews

JF - Earth-Science Reviews

SN - 0012-8252

ER -