The phylogeny of the louse genus Brueelia does not reflect host phylogeny

Kevin P. Johnson, R. J. Adams, Dale H. Clayton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Lice (Insecta: Phthiraptera) are often considered a model group of parasites for studies of cospeciation because of their high host specificity, and louse species in the genus Brueelia are relatively host-specific. To test the extent of cospeciation, we reconstructed a phylogeny for Brueelia from nuclear (EF1α) and mitochondrial (COI) DNA sequences. This phylogeny was generally well resolved and supported. Two major clades within Brueelia (as well as several other lineages) were identified, and these corresponded to major morphological differences in the preantennal region of the head and sclerotization of the abdomen. However, the phylogeny of Brueelia showed little concordance to a published phylogeny of the hosts. In addition, we uncovered four cases (out of 15 species) of one species of Brueelia on two or more bird species. We argue that the high dispersal capabilities of Brueelia species, e.g. phoresis on hippoboscid flies, are a likely explanation for the incongruence between host and parasite phylogenies in this case.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)233-247
Number of pages15
JournalBiological Journal of the Linnean Society
Volume77
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2002

Keywords

  • Birds
  • Cospeciation
  • Ctochrome oxidase I
  • Ectoparasites
  • Elongation factor-1α
  • Passerines
  • Phthiraptera
  • Systematics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The phylogeny of the louse genus Brueelia does not reflect host phylogeny'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this