One hundred eighty‐two University of Arizona employees each participated in one of two field studies of the valuation of fringe benefits. Findings included: (a) a lack of employee knowledge regarding employer cost and market value of the studied benefit, and (b) significant undervaluation of the benefit by employees. These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that employee benefit valuations anchor on employee contributions. Implications for practitioners and suggestions for further research are discussed.
|Original language||English (US)|
|Number of pages||12|
|State||Published - Jun 1985|
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Applied Psychology
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management