The notable and the null: Using mixed methods to understand the diverse impacts of residential mobility programs

Stefanie DeLuca, Greg J. Duncan, Micere Keels, Ruby Mendenhall

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

This chapter provides a unique contribution to the neighbourhood effects literature by demonstrating that data from in-depth interviews is capable of revealing some of the mechanisms behind unexpected quantitative findings. Such a mixed methods approach is regarded a major step forward in neighbourhood effects research. The chapter describes and attempts to explain unexpected findings from the Moving to Opportunity (MTO) program (mental health improvements which were not originally anticipated); a weak 'treatment' effect for many families (initial and subsequent moves to segregated, economically declining areas instead of higher opportunity neighbourhoods); null findings where large effects on individual outcomes were expected instead (MTO was primarily designed to enhance the employment prospects of adults and to improve the educational outcomes of children, but no effects on employment and education were found); and a set of conflicting findings (moves to low poverty neighbourhoods were found to be beneficial to girls, but harmful for boys). The use of mixed methods has shown how the potential of MTO-based policy approaches is limited by structural barriers, and the dynamics of poor families' beliefs, backgrounds and constraints.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationNeighbourhood effects research
Subtitle of host publicationNew perspectives
PublisherSpringer Netherlands
Pages195-223
Number of pages29
Volume9789400723092
ISBN (Electronic)9789400723092
ISBN (Print)9400723083, 9789400723085
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2012

Fingerprint

effect on employment
policy approach
mental health
poverty
interview
education
literature

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

DeLuca, S., Duncan, G. J., Keels, M., & Mendenhall, R. (2012). The notable and the null: Using mixed methods to understand the diverse impacts of residential mobility programs. In Neighbourhood effects research: New perspectives (Vol. 9789400723092, pp. 195-223). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2309-2-9

The notable and the null : Using mixed methods to understand the diverse impacts of residential mobility programs. / DeLuca, Stefanie; Duncan, Greg J.; Keels, Micere; Mendenhall, Ruby.

Neighbourhood effects research: New perspectives. Vol. 9789400723092 Springer Netherlands, 2012. p. 195-223.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

DeLuca, S, Duncan, GJ, Keels, M & Mendenhall, R 2012, The notable and the null: Using mixed methods to understand the diverse impacts of residential mobility programs. in Neighbourhood effects research: New perspectives. vol. 9789400723092, Springer Netherlands, pp. 195-223. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2309-2-9
DeLuca S, Duncan GJ, Keels M, Mendenhall R. The notable and the null: Using mixed methods to understand the diverse impacts of residential mobility programs. In Neighbourhood effects research: New perspectives. Vol. 9789400723092. Springer Netherlands. 2012. p. 195-223 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2309-2-9
DeLuca, Stefanie ; Duncan, Greg J. ; Keels, Micere ; Mendenhall, Ruby. / The notable and the null : Using mixed methods to understand the diverse impacts of residential mobility programs. Neighbourhood effects research: New perspectives. Vol. 9789400723092 Springer Netherlands, 2012. pp. 195-223
@inbook{15b440adc2e74efe872496022281339e,
title = "The notable and the null: Using mixed methods to understand the diverse impacts of residential mobility programs",
abstract = "This chapter provides a unique contribution to the neighbourhood effects literature by demonstrating that data from in-depth interviews is capable of revealing some of the mechanisms behind unexpected quantitative findings. Such a mixed methods approach is regarded a major step forward in neighbourhood effects research. The chapter describes and attempts to explain unexpected findings from the Moving to Opportunity (MTO) program (mental health improvements which were not originally anticipated); a weak 'treatment' effect for many families (initial and subsequent moves to segregated, economically declining areas instead of higher opportunity neighbourhoods); null findings where large effects on individual outcomes were expected instead (MTO was primarily designed to enhance the employment prospects of adults and to improve the educational outcomes of children, but no effects on employment and education were found); and a set of conflicting findings (moves to low poverty neighbourhoods were found to be beneficial to girls, but harmful for boys). The use of mixed methods has shown how the potential of MTO-based policy approaches is limited by structural barriers, and the dynamics of poor families' beliefs, backgrounds and constraints.",
author = "Stefanie DeLuca and Duncan, {Greg J.} and Micere Keels and Ruby Mendenhall",
year = "2012",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/978-94-007-2309-2-9",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9400723083",
volume = "9789400723092",
pages = "195--223",
booktitle = "Neighbourhood effects research",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - The notable and the null

T2 - Using mixed methods to understand the diverse impacts of residential mobility programs

AU - DeLuca, Stefanie

AU - Duncan, Greg J.

AU - Keels, Micere

AU - Mendenhall, Ruby

PY - 2012/12/1

Y1 - 2012/12/1

N2 - This chapter provides a unique contribution to the neighbourhood effects literature by demonstrating that data from in-depth interviews is capable of revealing some of the mechanisms behind unexpected quantitative findings. Such a mixed methods approach is regarded a major step forward in neighbourhood effects research. The chapter describes and attempts to explain unexpected findings from the Moving to Opportunity (MTO) program (mental health improvements which were not originally anticipated); a weak 'treatment' effect for many families (initial and subsequent moves to segregated, economically declining areas instead of higher opportunity neighbourhoods); null findings where large effects on individual outcomes were expected instead (MTO was primarily designed to enhance the employment prospects of adults and to improve the educational outcomes of children, but no effects on employment and education were found); and a set of conflicting findings (moves to low poverty neighbourhoods were found to be beneficial to girls, but harmful for boys). The use of mixed methods has shown how the potential of MTO-based policy approaches is limited by structural barriers, and the dynamics of poor families' beliefs, backgrounds and constraints.

AB - This chapter provides a unique contribution to the neighbourhood effects literature by demonstrating that data from in-depth interviews is capable of revealing some of the mechanisms behind unexpected quantitative findings. Such a mixed methods approach is regarded a major step forward in neighbourhood effects research. The chapter describes and attempts to explain unexpected findings from the Moving to Opportunity (MTO) program (mental health improvements which were not originally anticipated); a weak 'treatment' effect for many families (initial and subsequent moves to segregated, economically declining areas instead of higher opportunity neighbourhoods); null findings where large effects on individual outcomes were expected instead (MTO was primarily designed to enhance the employment prospects of adults and to improve the educational outcomes of children, but no effects on employment and education were found); and a set of conflicting findings (moves to low poverty neighbourhoods were found to be beneficial to girls, but harmful for boys). The use of mixed methods has shown how the potential of MTO-based policy approaches is limited by structural barriers, and the dynamics of poor families' beliefs, backgrounds and constraints.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84930981334&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84930981334&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-94-007-2309-2-9

DO - 10.1007/978-94-007-2309-2-9

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84930981334

SN - 9400723083

SN - 9789400723085

VL - 9789400723092

SP - 195

EP - 223

BT - Neighbourhood effects research

PB - Springer Netherlands

ER -