The New Status Quo of the Paris Agreement: The Psychological Impact of the 2 Degrees Aspiration

Kristen Arden Rowell, Josephine Van Zeben

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This brief opinion piece draws upon behavioural and cognitive research to argue that the Paris Agreement's goal of keeping global temperature change below 2 degrees Celsius sets a psychologically powerful baseline against which future policy failures can be measured. When international law successfully triggers perception of a baseline, it can lead decisionmakers to perceive deviations from that baseline as "losses." This implicates loss aversion, which provides an additional motivation to achieve international norms. The psychological impacts of this new status quo may end up being more powerful and more durable than either the unusual structure of the document or the domestic implementation questions that have already attracted so much scholarly debate.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)49-53
Number of pages5
JournalEuropean Journal of Risk Regulation
Volume5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2016

Fingerprint

global change
international law
International law
Temperature

Keywords

  • International law
  • Loss aversion
  • Prospect theory
  • status quo bias
  • baseline
  • psychology of law
  • Paris agreement
  • climate change

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Safety Research

Cite this

The New Status Quo of the Paris Agreement : The Psychological Impact of the 2 Degrees Aspiration. / Rowell, Kristen Arden; Van Zeben, Josephine.

In: European Journal of Risk Regulation, Vol. 5, 01.01.2016, p. 49-53.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e07dd209b96b46449bd3fd4228571d3f,
title = "The New Status Quo of the Paris Agreement: The Psychological Impact of the 2 Degrees Aspiration",
abstract = "This brief opinion piece draws upon behavioural and cognitive research to argue that the Paris Agreement's goal of keeping global temperature change below 2 degrees Celsius sets a psychologically powerful baseline against which future policy failures can be measured. When international law successfully triggers perception of a baseline, it can lead decisionmakers to perceive deviations from that baseline as {"}losses.{"} This implicates loss aversion, which provides an additional motivation to achieve international norms. The psychological impacts of this new status quo may end up being more powerful and more durable than either the unusual structure of the document or the domestic implementation questions that have already attracted so much scholarly debate.",
keywords = "International law, Loss aversion, Prospect theory, status quo bias, baseline, psychology of law, Paris agreement, climate change",
author = "Rowell, {Kristen Arden} and {Van Zeben}, Josephine",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/S1867299X00005377",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "49--53",
journal = "European Journal of Risk Regulation",
issn = "1867-299X",
publisher = "Lexxion",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The New Status Quo of the Paris Agreement

T2 - The Psychological Impact of the 2 Degrees Aspiration

AU - Rowell, Kristen Arden

AU - Van Zeben, Josephine

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - This brief opinion piece draws upon behavioural and cognitive research to argue that the Paris Agreement's goal of keeping global temperature change below 2 degrees Celsius sets a psychologically powerful baseline against which future policy failures can be measured. When international law successfully triggers perception of a baseline, it can lead decisionmakers to perceive deviations from that baseline as "losses." This implicates loss aversion, which provides an additional motivation to achieve international norms. The psychological impacts of this new status quo may end up being more powerful and more durable than either the unusual structure of the document or the domestic implementation questions that have already attracted so much scholarly debate.

AB - This brief opinion piece draws upon behavioural and cognitive research to argue that the Paris Agreement's goal of keeping global temperature change below 2 degrees Celsius sets a psychologically powerful baseline against which future policy failures can be measured. When international law successfully triggers perception of a baseline, it can lead decisionmakers to perceive deviations from that baseline as "losses." This implicates loss aversion, which provides an additional motivation to achieve international norms. The psychological impacts of this new status quo may end up being more powerful and more durable than either the unusual structure of the document or the domestic implementation questions that have already attracted so much scholarly debate.

KW - International law

KW - Loss aversion

KW - Prospect theory

KW - status quo bias

KW - baseline

KW - psychology of law

KW - Paris agreement

KW - climate change

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85002824656&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85002824656&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/S1867299X00005377

DO - 10.1017/S1867299X00005377

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85002824656

VL - 5

SP - 49

EP - 53

JO - European Journal of Risk Regulation

JF - European Journal of Risk Regulation

SN - 1867-299X

ER -