The new science of eyewitness memory

Scott D. Gronlund, Aaron S Benjamin

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

The prevailing view among criminal justice and legal practitioners, and the general public, is that eyewitness evidence is generally inaccurate and unreliable. Here we argue that that perspective fails to take the full cognitive context of eyewitness reports into account. A broader view of eyewitness cognition includes both memory judgments—for example, the selection of an individual from a lineup—and an accompanying metacognitive context—for example, the level of confidence that an eyewitness places in that selection. When these components are considered jointly, eyewitness evidence is highly reliable and can be treated like any other source of evidence in the courtroom—valuable when appropriately assayed but prone to contamination. Empirical research over the past 10 years, based on the bedrock principles of Signal Detection Theory, has illuminated problems with standard historical measures that are based on intuitive theorizing about measurement. Those measures, and the results from experiments that utilize them, have misled the field regarding reform efforts and have diminished the role that eyewitness confidence should play in distinguishing accurate from inaccurate identifications. Signal detection theory, coupled with ROC analysis and confidence calibration, is pointing toward a new science of eyewitness memory. The new science shifts the blame for faulty testimony from unreliable eyewitnesses to other actors in the law enforcement and legal community—actors whose behaviors can transform low-confidence, likely inaccurate, initial identifications, into incorrect, high-confidence, courtroom identifications. Signal detection theory also highlights the role that other metacognitive factors play, as well as how to balance the two types of errors—false identifications of the innocent and missed identifications of the guilty—that inevitably arise from the eyewitness decision problem. The new science of eyewitness memory is leading a transformation in how eyewitness evidence can and should be used by the criminal justice system.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationPsychology of Learning and Motivation - Advances in Research and Theory
EditorsKara D. Federmeier
PublisherAcademic Press Inc.
Pages241-284
Number of pages44
ISBN (Print)9780128150856
DOIs
StatePublished - 2018

Publication series

NamePsychology of Learning and Motivation - Advances in Research and Theory
Volume69
ISSN (Print)0079-7421

Fingerprint

Criminal Law
Law Enforcement
Empirical Research
ROC Curve
General Practitioners
Cognition
Calibration
Psychological Signal Detection

Keywords

  • Calibration analysis
  • Eyewitness identification
  • ROC analysis
  • Recognition memory
  • Relative judgment theory
  • Signal detection theory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

Gronlund, S. D., & Benjamin, A. S. (2018). The new science of eyewitness memory. In K. D. Federmeier (Ed.), Psychology of Learning and Motivation - Advances in Research and Theory (pp. 241-284). (Psychology of Learning and Motivation - Advances in Research and Theory; Vol. 69). Academic Press Inc.. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.plm.2018.09.006

The new science of eyewitness memory. / Gronlund, Scott D.; Benjamin, Aaron S.

Psychology of Learning and Motivation - Advances in Research and Theory. ed. / Kara D. Federmeier. Academic Press Inc., 2018. p. 241-284 (Psychology of Learning and Motivation - Advances in Research and Theory; Vol. 69).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Gronlund, SD & Benjamin, AS 2018, The new science of eyewitness memory. in KD Federmeier (ed.), Psychology of Learning and Motivation - Advances in Research and Theory. Psychology of Learning and Motivation - Advances in Research and Theory, vol. 69, Academic Press Inc., pp. 241-284. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.plm.2018.09.006
Gronlund SD, Benjamin AS. The new science of eyewitness memory. In Federmeier KD, editor, Psychology of Learning and Motivation - Advances in Research and Theory. Academic Press Inc. 2018. p. 241-284. (Psychology of Learning and Motivation - Advances in Research and Theory). https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.plm.2018.09.006
Gronlund, Scott D. ; Benjamin, Aaron S. / The new science of eyewitness memory. Psychology of Learning and Motivation - Advances in Research and Theory. editor / Kara D. Federmeier. Academic Press Inc., 2018. pp. 241-284 (Psychology of Learning and Motivation - Advances in Research and Theory).
@inbook{dadca4b30d3e45409a20d91aaa7ed3e1,
title = "The new science of eyewitness memory",
abstract = "The prevailing view among criminal justice and legal practitioners, and the general public, is that eyewitness evidence is generally inaccurate and unreliable. Here we argue that that perspective fails to take the full cognitive context of eyewitness reports into account. A broader view of eyewitness cognition includes both memory judgments—for example, the selection of an individual from a lineup—and an accompanying metacognitive context—for example, the level of confidence that an eyewitness places in that selection. When these components are considered jointly, eyewitness evidence is highly reliable and can be treated like any other source of evidence in the courtroom—valuable when appropriately assayed but prone to contamination. Empirical research over the past 10 years, based on the bedrock principles of Signal Detection Theory, has illuminated problems with standard historical measures that are based on intuitive theorizing about measurement. Those measures, and the results from experiments that utilize them, have misled the field regarding reform efforts and have diminished the role that eyewitness confidence should play in distinguishing accurate from inaccurate identifications. Signal detection theory, coupled with ROC analysis and confidence calibration, is pointing toward a new science of eyewitness memory. The new science shifts the blame for faulty testimony from unreliable eyewitnesses to other actors in the law enforcement and legal community—actors whose behaviors can transform low-confidence, likely inaccurate, initial identifications, into incorrect, high-confidence, courtroom identifications. Signal detection theory also highlights the role that other metacognitive factors play, as well as how to balance the two types of errors—false identifications of the innocent and missed identifications of the guilty—that inevitably arise from the eyewitness decision problem. The new science of eyewitness memory is leading a transformation in how eyewitness evidence can and should be used by the criminal justice system.",
keywords = "Calibration analysis, Eyewitness identification, ROC analysis, Recognition memory, Relative judgment theory, Signal detection theory",
author = "Gronlund, {Scott D.} and Benjamin, {Aaron S}",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1016/bs.plm.2018.09.006",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780128150856",
series = "Psychology of Learning and Motivation - Advances in Research and Theory",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
pages = "241--284",
editor = "Federmeier, {Kara D.}",
booktitle = "Psychology of Learning and Motivation - Advances in Research and Theory",
address = "United States",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - The new science of eyewitness memory

AU - Gronlund, Scott D.

AU - Benjamin, Aaron S

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - The prevailing view among criminal justice and legal practitioners, and the general public, is that eyewitness evidence is generally inaccurate and unreliable. Here we argue that that perspective fails to take the full cognitive context of eyewitness reports into account. A broader view of eyewitness cognition includes both memory judgments—for example, the selection of an individual from a lineup—and an accompanying metacognitive context—for example, the level of confidence that an eyewitness places in that selection. When these components are considered jointly, eyewitness evidence is highly reliable and can be treated like any other source of evidence in the courtroom—valuable when appropriately assayed but prone to contamination. Empirical research over the past 10 years, based on the bedrock principles of Signal Detection Theory, has illuminated problems with standard historical measures that are based on intuitive theorizing about measurement. Those measures, and the results from experiments that utilize them, have misled the field regarding reform efforts and have diminished the role that eyewitness confidence should play in distinguishing accurate from inaccurate identifications. Signal detection theory, coupled with ROC analysis and confidence calibration, is pointing toward a new science of eyewitness memory. The new science shifts the blame for faulty testimony from unreliable eyewitnesses to other actors in the law enforcement and legal community—actors whose behaviors can transform low-confidence, likely inaccurate, initial identifications, into incorrect, high-confidence, courtroom identifications. Signal detection theory also highlights the role that other metacognitive factors play, as well as how to balance the two types of errors—false identifications of the innocent and missed identifications of the guilty—that inevitably arise from the eyewitness decision problem. The new science of eyewitness memory is leading a transformation in how eyewitness evidence can and should be used by the criminal justice system.

AB - The prevailing view among criminal justice and legal practitioners, and the general public, is that eyewitness evidence is generally inaccurate and unreliable. Here we argue that that perspective fails to take the full cognitive context of eyewitness reports into account. A broader view of eyewitness cognition includes both memory judgments—for example, the selection of an individual from a lineup—and an accompanying metacognitive context—for example, the level of confidence that an eyewitness places in that selection. When these components are considered jointly, eyewitness evidence is highly reliable and can be treated like any other source of evidence in the courtroom—valuable when appropriately assayed but prone to contamination. Empirical research over the past 10 years, based on the bedrock principles of Signal Detection Theory, has illuminated problems with standard historical measures that are based on intuitive theorizing about measurement. Those measures, and the results from experiments that utilize them, have misled the field regarding reform efforts and have diminished the role that eyewitness confidence should play in distinguishing accurate from inaccurate identifications. Signal detection theory, coupled with ROC analysis and confidence calibration, is pointing toward a new science of eyewitness memory. The new science shifts the blame for faulty testimony from unreliable eyewitnesses to other actors in the law enforcement and legal community—actors whose behaviors can transform low-confidence, likely inaccurate, initial identifications, into incorrect, high-confidence, courtroom identifications. Signal detection theory also highlights the role that other metacognitive factors play, as well as how to balance the two types of errors—false identifications of the innocent and missed identifications of the guilty—that inevitably arise from the eyewitness decision problem. The new science of eyewitness memory is leading a transformation in how eyewitness evidence can and should be used by the criminal justice system.

KW - Calibration analysis

KW - Eyewitness identification

KW - ROC analysis

KW - Recognition memory

KW - Relative judgment theory

KW - Signal detection theory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056279712&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85056279712&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/bs.plm.2018.09.006

DO - 10.1016/bs.plm.2018.09.006

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:85056279712

SN - 9780128150856

T3 - Psychology of Learning and Motivation - Advances in Research and Theory

SP - 241

EP - 284

BT - Psychology of Learning and Motivation - Advances in Research and Theory

A2 - Federmeier, Kara D.

PB - Academic Press Inc.

ER -