The National Football League Wagering Market: Simple Strategies and Bye Week–Related Inefficiencies

Yoon Tae Sung, Scott Tainsky

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This investigation tests the Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH) in the National Football League (NFL) wagering market from 2002 to 2009. The current study examines simple betting strategies tested previously in the NFL and other sports leagues as well as whether there is a bias in games after a team’s bye week. The findings suggest that favorites and especially road team favorites following a bye week won statistically more bets than their opponents. Although the majority of our analysis supported the EMH, the exceptions provide evidence of inefficiencies in the NFL betting market.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)365-384
Number of pages20
JournalJournal of Sports Economics
Volume15
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2014

Keywords

  • NFL
  • bias
  • market efficiency
  • wagering

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The National Football League Wagering Market: Simple Strategies and Bye Week–Related Inefficiencies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this