The Missing Branch of the Jury

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Over time, the criminal, civil, and grand juries have declined in power. Cost, incompetence, inaccuracy, and inefficiency are often cited as the reasons for this fall. Recognizing that authority that formerly resided in the jury has shifted to the traditional constitutional actors of the executive, the legislature, the judiciary, and the states, this article explores a new theory for the decline of the jury. In the past, the Supreme Court has used the doctrines of the separation of powers and federalism to protect the power of the traditional actors including the branches, while it has not used any similar doctrine to preserve jury authority. At the same time, the power of the jury has eroded. This article argues that the jury is effectively a “branch” of government — similar to the executive, the legislature, and the judiciary — that has not been recognized and protected. In many instances the Court originally found authority in the jury to later take the same authority and give it to a traditional actor. A novel study helps explain why the status of the jury has changed. It shows that legal elites and corporations appear to have influenced this shift against jury authority.
Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1261-1321
Number of pages62
JournalOhio State Law Journal
Volume77
Issue number6
StatePublished - 2016

Fingerprint

judiciary
doctrine
separation of powers
federalism
Supreme Court
corporation
elite
costs
time

Keywords

  • Seventh Amendment
  • Article III
  • Fifth Amendment
  • Tenth Amendment
  • Executive
  • legislature
  • judiciary
  • civil jury
  • criminal jury
  • branch
  • separation of powers
  • Federalism

Cite this

The Missing Branch of the Jury. / Thomas, Suja A.

In: Ohio State Law Journal, Vol. 77, No. 6, 2016, p. 1261-1321.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Thomas, SA 2016, 'The Missing Branch of the Jury', Ohio State Law Journal, vol. 77, no. 6, pp. 1261-1321.
Thomas, Suja A. / The Missing Branch of the Jury. In: Ohio State Law Journal. 2016 ; Vol. 77, No. 6. pp. 1261-1321.
@article{bbac141e1f76466caa7d869d3ea6f141,
title = "The Missing Branch of the Jury",
abstract = "Over time, the criminal, civil, and grand juries have declined in power. Cost, incompetence, inaccuracy, and inefficiency are often cited as the reasons for this fall. Recognizing that authority that formerly resided in the jury has shifted to the traditional constitutional actors of the executive, the legislature, the judiciary, and the states, this article explores a new theory for the decline of the jury. In the past, the Supreme Court has used the doctrines of the separation of powers and federalism to protect the power of the traditional actors including the branches, while it has not used any similar doctrine to preserve jury authority. At the same time, the power of the jury has eroded. This article argues that the jury is effectively a “branch” of government — similar to the executive, the legislature, and the judiciary — that has not been recognized and protected. In many instances the Court originally found authority in the jury to later take the same authority and give it to a traditional actor. A novel study helps explain why the status of the jury has changed. It shows that legal elites and corporations appear to have influenced this shift against jury authority.",
keywords = "Seventh Amendment, Article III, Fifth Amendment, Tenth Amendment, Executive, legislature, judiciary, civil jury, criminal jury, branch, separation of powers, Federalism",
author = "Thomas, {Suja A}",
year = "2016",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "77",
pages = "1261--1321",
journal = "Ohio State Law Journal",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Missing Branch of the Jury

AU - Thomas, Suja A

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Over time, the criminal, civil, and grand juries have declined in power. Cost, incompetence, inaccuracy, and inefficiency are often cited as the reasons for this fall. Recognizing that authority that formerly resided in the jury has shifted to the traditional constitutional actors of the executive, the legislature, the judiciary, and the states, this article explores a new theory for the decline of the jury. In the past, the Supreme Court has used the doctrines of the separation of powers and federalism to protect the power of the traditional actors including the branches, while it has not used any similar doctrine to preserve jury authority. At the same time, the power of the jury has eroded. This article argues that the jury is effectively a “branch” of government — similar to the executive, the legislature, and the judiciary — that has not been recognized and protected. In many instances the Court originally found authority in the jury to later take the same authority and give it to a traditional actor. A novel study helps explain why the status of the jury has changed. It shows that legal elites and corporations appear to have influenced this shift against jury authority.

AB - Over time, the criminal, civil, and grand juries have declined in power. Cost, incompetence, inaccuracy, and inefficiency are often cited as the reasons for this fall. Recognizing that authority that formerly resided in the jury has shifted to the traditional constitutional actors of the executive, the legislature, the judiciary, and the states, this article explores a new theory for the decline of the jury. In the past, the Supreme Court has used the doctrines of the separation of powers and federalism to protect the power of the traditional actors including the branches, while it has not used any similar doctrine to preserve jury authority. At the same time, the power of the jury has eroded. This article argues that the jury is effectively a “branch” of government — similar to the executive, the legislature, and the judiciary — that has not been recognized and protected. In many instances the Court originally found authority in the jury to later take the same authority and give it to a traditional actor. A novel study helps explain why the status of the jury has changed. It shows that legal elites and corporations appear to have influenced this shift against jury authority.

KW - Seventh Amendment

KW - Article III

KW - Fifth Amendment

KW - Tenth Amendment

KW - Executive

KW - legislature

KW - judiciary

KW - civil jury

KW - criminal jury

KW - branch

KW - separation of powers

KW - Federalism

M3 - Article

VL - 77

SP - 1261

EP - 1321

JO - Ohio State Law Journal

JF - Ohio State Law Journal

IS - 6

ER -