The Limits of History

The English Fire Courts, Congress, the Seventh Amendment Civil Jury Trial

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Can Congress create Article III courts to decide civil cases where plaintiffs claim damages that are related to certain crises, such as the mortgage crisis — thus, shifting those cases from juries to judges to decide? Jay Tidmarsh said yes in an article published in the University of Chicago Law Review. He did not properly consider, however, the limits of history's influence on the Seventh Amendment. This article describes those limits and the actual conditions for the right to a jury trial in the late eighteenth century — the relevant time period for determining the scope of the jury trial. It further shows that Congress does not have the significant authority to usurp the jury for which Tidmarsh has argued.
Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)281-295
Number of pages15
JournalChicago Law Review Online
Volume83
StatePublished - 2018

Fingerprint

amendment
history
eighteenth century
damages
Law
time

Keywords

  • Seventh Amendment
  • civil jury
  • congress
  • fire courts

Cite this

@article{ab16dab8beac493b95d8a31b7bf6208a,
title = "The Limits of History: The English Fire Courts, Congress, the Seventh Amendment Civil Jury Trial",
abstract = "Can Congress create Article III courts to decide civil cases where plaintiffs claim damages that are related to certain crises, such as the mortgage crisis — thus, shifting those cases from juries to judges to decide? Jay Tidmarsh said yes in an article published in the University of Chicago Law Review. He did not properly consider, however, the limits of history's influence on the Seventh Amendment. This article describes those limits and the actual conditions for the right to a jury trial in the late eighteenth century — the relevant time period for determining the scope of the jury trial. It further shows that Congress does not have the significant authority to usurp the jury for which Tidmarsh has argued.",
keywords = "Seventh Amendment, civil jury, congress, fire courts",
author = "Thomas, {Suja A.}",
year = "2018",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "83",
pages = "281--295",
journal = "Chicago Law Review Online",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Limits of History

T2 - The English Fire Courts, Congress, the Seventh Amendment Civil Jury Trial

AU - Thomas, Suja A.

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Can Congress create Article III courts to decide civil cases where plaintiffs claim damages that are related to certain crises, such as the mortgage crisis — thus, shifting those cases from juries to judges to decide? Jay Tidmarsh said yes in an article published in the University of Chicago Law Review. He did not properly consider, however, the limits of history's influence on the Seventh Amendment. This article describes those limits and the actual conditions for the right to a jury trial in the late eighteenth century — the relevant time period for determining the scope of the jury trial. It further shows that Congress does not have the significant authority to usurp the jury for which Tidmarsh has argued.

AB - Can Congress create Article III courts to decide civil cases where plaintiffs claim damages that are related to certain crises, such as the mortgage crisis — thus, shifting those cases from juries to judges to decide? Jay Tidmarsh said yes in an article published in the University of Chicago Law Review. He did not properly consider, however, the limits of history's influence on the Seventh Amendment. This article describes those limits and the actual conditions for the right to a jury trial in the late eighteenth century — the relevant time period for determining the scope of the jury trial. It further shows that Congress does not have the significant authority to usurp the jury for which Tidmarsh has argued.

KW - Seventh Amendment

KW - civil jury

KW - congress

KW - fire courts

M3 - Article

VL - 83

SP - 281

EP - 295

JO - Chicago Law Review Online

JF - Chicago Law Review Online

ER -