TY - JOUR
T1 - The Latitudinal Variability of Oceanic Rainfall Properties and Its Implication for Satellite Retrievals
T2 - 1. Drop Size Distribution Properties
AU - Protat, Alain
AU - Klepp, Christian
AU - Louf, Valentin
AU - Petersen, Walter A.
AU - Alexander, Simon P.
AU - Barros, Ana
AU - Leinonen, Jussi
AU - Mace, Gerald G.
N1 - Funding Information:
, Klepp et al., ). This study was partly funded by the National Environmental Science Program (NESP), Australia. The sustained funding by Initiative Pro Klima (Mabanaft, Mabanaft Deutschland, Petronord and OIL! Tankstellen GmbH & Co. KG) enabled the development, operation and research on OceanRAIN. We greatly appreciate this support and gratefully thank Tanja Thiele, Gerhard Grambow, Volker Tiedemann, Ulrich Freudental and Jan Falke. The project was hosted and co‐funded by CliSAP/CEN, University of Hamburg, and the Max Planck Society (MPG). The authors wish to acknowledge the contribution of the Australian Marine National Facility MNF (Brett Muir and Will Ponsonby) for their help setting up and taking care of the ODM470 disdrometer on RV Investigator, and Dr. Toshio Iguchi from the National Institute of Information and Communications Technology, Japan, for useful discussions about details of the GPM dual‐frequency radar rainfall algorithm. The Australian Antarctic Division's contribution was supported by project 4387 of the Australian Antarctic program. W. Petersen acknowledges the NASA PMM funding support provided by Dr. G. Skofronick‐Jackson and the GPM NASA Ground Validation Program. All OceanRAIN data used in this study are publicly available through the website http://www.oceanrain.org/ and the World Data Center for Climate (WDCC, data referenced as Klepp et al.,
Funding Information:
This study was partly funded by the National Environmental Science Program (NESP), Australia. The sustained funding by Initiative Pro Klima (Mabanaft, Mabanaft Deutschland, Petronord and OIL! Tankstellen GmbH & Co. KG) enabled the development, operation and research on OceanRAIN. We greatly appreciate this support and gratefully thank Tanja Thiele, Gerhard Grambow, Volker Tiedemann, Ulrich Freudental and Jan Falke. The project was hosted and co-funded by CliSAP/CEN, University of Hamburg, and the Max Planck Society (MPG). The authors wish to acknowledge the contribution of the Australian Marine National Facility MNF (Brett Muir and Will Ponsonby) for their help setting up and taking care of the ODM470 disdrometer on RV Investigator, and Dr. Toshio Iguchi from the National Institute of Information and Communications Technology, Japan, for useful discussions about details of the GPM dual-frequency radar rainfall algorithm. The Australian Antarctic Division's contribution was supported by project 4387 of the Australian Antarctic program. W. Petersen acknowledges the NASA PMM funding support provided by Dr. G. Skofronick-Jackson and the GPM NASA Ground Validation Program. All OceanRAIN data used in this study are publicly available through the website http://www.oceanrain.org/ and the World Data Center for Climate (WDCC, data referenced as Klepp et al., Klepp et al.,).
Publisher Copyright:
©2019. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.
PY - 2019/12/16
Y1 - 2019/12/16
N2 - In this study, we analyze an in situ shipboard global ocean drop size distribution (DSD) 8-year database to understand the underpinning microphysical reasons for discrepancies between satellite oceanic rainfall products at high latitudes reported in the literature. The natural, latitudinal, and convective-stratiform variability of the DSD is found to be large, with a substantially lower drop concentration with diameter smaller than 3 mm in the Southern hemisphere high latitude (S-highlat, south of 45°S) and Northern Hemisphere polar latitude (N-polar, north of 67.5°S) bands, which is where satellite rainfall products most disagree. In contrast, the latitudinal variability of the normalized oceanic DSD is small, implying that the functional form of the normalized DSD can be assumed constant and accurately parameterized using proposed fits. The S-highlat and N-polar latitude bands stand out as regions with oceanic rainfall properties different from other latitudes, highlighting fundamental differences in rainfall processes at different latitudes and associated specific challenges for satellite rainfall retrieval techniques. The most salient differences in DSD properties between these two regions and the other latitude bands are: (1) a systematically higher (lower) frequency of occurrence of rainfall rates below (above) 1 mm h-1, (2) much lower drop concentrations, (3) very different values of the DSD shape parameter (μ0) from what is currently assumed in satellite radar rainfall algorithms, and (4) very different DSD properties in both the convective and stratiform rainfall regimes. Overall, this study provides insights into how DSD assumptions in satellite radar rainfall retrieval techniques could be refined.
AB - In this study, we analyze an in situ shipboard global ocean drop size distribution (DSD) 8-year database to understand the underpinning microphysical reasons for discrepancies between satellite oceanic rainfall products at high latitudes reported in the literature. The natural, latitudinal, and convective-stratiform variability of the DSD is found to be large, with a substantially lower drop concentration with diameter smaller than 3 mm in the Southern hemisphere high latitude (S-highlat, south of 45°S) and Northern Hemisphere polar latitude (N-polar, north of 67.5°S) bands, which is where satellite rainfall products most disagree. In contrast, the latitudinal variability of the normalized oceanic DSD is small, implying that the functional form of the normalized DSD can be assumed constant and accurately parameterized using proposed fits. The S-highlat and N-polar latitude bands stand out as regions with oceanic rainfall properties different from other latitudes, highlighting fundamental differences in rainfall processes at different latitudes and associated specific challenges for satellite rainfall retrieval techniques. The most salient differences in DSD properties between these two regions and the other latitude bands are: (1) a systematically higher (lower) frequency of occurrence of rainfall rates below (above) 1 mm h-1, (2) much lower drop concentrations, (3) very different values of the DSD shape parameter (μ0) from what is currently assumed in satellite radar rainfall algorithms, and (4) very different DSD properties in both the convective and stratiform rainfall regimes. Overall, this study provides insights into how DSD assumptions in satellite radar rainfall retrieval techniques could be refined.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85076796769&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85076796769&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1029/2019JD031010
DO - 10.1029/2019JD031010
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85076796769
SN - 2169-897X
VL - 124
SP - 13291
EP - 13311
JO - Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
JF - Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
IS - 23
ER -