The Jury and Abjury of My Peers: The Self in Face and Dignity Cultures

Young Hoon Kim, Dov Cohen, Wing Tung Au

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The self is defined and judged differently by people from face and dignity cultures (in this case, Hong Kong and the United States, respectively). Across 3 experiments, people from a face culture absorbed the judgments of other people into their private self-definitions. Particularly important for people from a face culture are public representations-knowledge that is shared and known to be shared about someone. In contrast, people from a dignity culture try to preserve the sovereign self by not letting others define them. In the 3 experiments, dignity culture participants showed a studied indifference to the judgments of their peers, ignoring peers' assessments-whether those assessments were public or private, were positive or negative, or were made by qualified peers or unqualified peers. Ways that the self is " knotted" up with social judgments and cultural imperatives are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)904-916
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of personality and social psychology
Volume98
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2010

Fingerprint

Hong Kong
social judgement
experiment

Keywords

  • Culture
  • Dignity
  • Face
  • Perspective-taking
  • Self

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

The Jury and Abjury of My Peers : The Self in Face and Dignity Cultures. / Kim, Young Hoon; Cohen, Dov; Au, Wing Tung.

In: Journal of personality and social psychology, Vol. 98, No. 6, 06.2010, p. 904-916.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a388025994d941c39c061284fa2ea196,
title = "The Jury and Abjury of My Peers: The Self in Face and Dignity Cultures",
abstract = "The self is defined and judged differently by people from face and dignity cultures (in this case, Hong Kong and the United States, respectively). Across 3 experiments, people from a face culture absorbed the judgments of other people into their private self-definitions. Particularly important for people from a face culture are public representations-knowledge that is shared and known to be shared about someone. In contrast, people from a dignity culture try to preserve the sovereign self by not letting others define them. In the 3 experiments, dignity culture participants showed a studied indifference to the judgments of their peers, ignoring peers' assessments-whether those assessments were public or private, were positive or negative, or were made by qualified peers or unqualified peers. Ways that the self is {"} knotted{"} up with social judgments and cultural imperatives are discussed.",
keywords = "Culture, Dignity, Face, Perspective-taking, Self",
author = "Kim, {Young Hoon} and Dov Cohen and Au, {Wing Tung}",
year = "2010",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1037/a0017936",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "98",
pages = "904--916",
journal = "Journal of Personality and Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-3514",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Jury and Abjury of My Peers

T2 - The Self in Face and Dignity Cultures

AU - Kim, Young Hoon

AU - Cohen, Dov

AU - Au, Wing Tung

PY - 2010/6

Y1 - 2010/6

N2 - The self is defined and judged differently by people from face and dignity cultures (in this case, Hong Kong and the United States, respectively). Across 3 experiments, people from a face culture absorbed the judgments of other people into their private self-definitions. Particularly important for people from a face culture are public representations-knowledge that is shared and known to be shared about someone. In contrast, people from a dignity culture try to preserve the sovereign self by not letting others define them. In the 3 experiments, dignity culture participants showed a studied indifference to the judgments of their peers, ignoring peers' assessments-whether those assessments were public or private, were positive or negative, or were made by qualified peers or unqualified peers. Ways that the self is " knotted" up with social judgments and cultural imperatives are discussed.

AB - The self is defined and judged differently by people from face and dignity cultures (in this case, Hong Kong and the United States, respectively). Across 3 experiments, people from a face culture absorbed the judgments of other people into their private self-definitions. Particularly important for people from a face culture are public representations-knowledge that is shared and known to be shared about someone. In contrast, people from a dignity culture try to preserve the sovereign self by not letting others define them. In the 3 experiments, dignity culture participants showed a studied indifference to the judgments of their peers, ignoring peers' assessments-whether those assessments were public or private, were positive or negative, or were made by qualified peers or unqualified peers. Ways that the self is " knotted" up with social judgments and cultural imperatives are discussed.

KW - Culture

KW - Dignity

KW - Face

KW - Perspective-taking

KW - Self

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77954789700&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77954789700&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/a0017936

DO - 10.1037/a0017936

M3 - Article

C2 - 20515246

AN - SCOPUS:77954789700

VL - 98

SP - 904

EP - 916

JO - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

SN - 0022-3514

IS - 6

ER -