Abstract
Elicited narrative studies have shown that the underlying pragmatic factor of empathy is relatively preserved in aphasic speakers of Japanese and English (7 Japanese and 14 English-speaking aphasics of varied diagnostic types). Occasional 'reversal errors' can be explained in terms of a conflict between the normal encoding of the empathic characteristics of an event and the syntactic limitations imposed by impaired production processes. To account for these findings, we propose a production model following Levelt (1989) for making pragmatic choices among syntactic forms. We also suggest that preferential access to 'canonical form' might be a matter of surface morphosyntax, rather than involving semantics or more abstract levels of syntax.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 183-225 |
Number of pages | 43 |
Journal | Brain and Language |
Volume | 61 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Feb 1 1998 |
Externally published | Yes |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Language and Linguistics
- Linguistics and Language
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Speech and Hearing