TY - JOUR
T1 - The Intensity of adoption of Conservation agriculture by smallholder farmers in Zimbabwe
AU - Pedzisa, Tarisayi
AU - Rugube, Lovemore
AU - Winter-Nelson, Alex
AU - Baylis, Kathy
AU - Mazvimavi, Kizito
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa.
PY - 2015/7/3
Y1 - 2015/7/3
N2 - This article assesses the intensity of technology adoption of conservation agriculture (CA) techniques by smallholder farmers in Zimbabwe. It seeks to understand the drivers of CA adoption intensity in terms of the number of practices implemented using count data analysis. On average, the farmers in our sample adopt five out of eight possible CA practices while only 7.4% use all eight practices in any one year. Practices such as digging planting basins (81.9%), applying manure (73.2%) and timely post-planting weeding (70.1%) are relatively popular, while adoption of crop rotation (22.8%) is comparatively rare. Productivity is positively correlated to the number of techniques used. Farmers adopting all the CA practices are the most productive, with an estimated maize yield of 2.50 tons/ha, compared with a yield of less than 1 tons/ha for those using three techniques or fewer. Results from a Poisson regression indicate that education, agro-ecology, non-governmental input support and extension support have a significant impact on adoption intensity. Subsidised inputs increase the number of components used, although access to those inputs was uneven across regions of Zimbabwe. Further, the number of CA components used in the previous season positively impacts current season adoption intensity, implying that promotions of CA technologies do have a persistent effect, even after those promotions end.
AB - This article assesses the intensity of technology adoption of conservation agriculture (CA) techniques by smallholder farmers in Zimbabwe. It seeks to understand the drivers of CA adoption intensity in terms of the number of practices implemented using count data analysis. On average, the farmers in our sample adopt five out of eight possible CA practices while only 7.4% use all eight practices in any one year. Practices such as digging planting basins (81.9%), applying manure (73.2%) and timely post-planting weeding (70.1%) are relatively popular, while adoption of crop rotation (22.8%) is comparatively rare. Productivity is positively correlated to the number of techniques used. Farmers adopting all the CA practices are the most productive, with an estimated maize yield of 2.50 tons/ha, compared with a yield of less than 1 tons/ha for those using three techniques or fewer. Results from a Poisson regression indicate that education, agro-ecology, non-governmental input support and extension support have a significant impact on adoption intensity. Subsidised inputs increase the number of components used, although access to those inputs was uneven across regions of Zimbabwe. Further, the number of CA components used in the previous season positively impacts current season adoption intensity, implying that promotions of CA technologies do have a persistent effect, even after those promotions end.
KW - adoption intensity
KW - conservation agriculture
KW - count regression
KW - smallholder farmer
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84954153009&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84954153009&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/03031853.2015.1084939
DO - 10.1080/03031853.2015.1084939
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84954153009
SN - 0303-1853
VL - 54
SP - 1
EP - 22
JO - Agrekon
JF - Agrekon
IS - 3
ER -