TY - JOUR
T1 - The institutional landscape of interest group politics and school choice
AU - DeBray-Pelot, Elizabeth H.
AU - Lubienski, Christopher A.
AU - Scott, Janelle T.
N1 - Funding Information:
BAEO engages in activities such as state-level political organizing (i.e., providing support to legislators) and coordinating with churches located in primarily minority communities. Hispanic CREO, which is supported by the Bradley, Walton, and Daniel Foundations, supports a range of choices for parents, from public and magnet and charter schools to home schools and private schools. Said Maite Arce of CREO of their relationship
PY - 2007
Y1 - 2007
N2 - This article provides an updated analysis of the institutional and organizational landscape surrounding the advocacy of and opposition to vouchers and other forms of school choice over the past decade at federal/national, state, and local levels. The politics of choice grew far more complex during the 1990s, with Republican control of Congress and the White House, the growth of the national charter school movement, congressional passage of pilot voucher programs, and the Supreme Court's 2002 Zelman v. Simmons-Harris ruling. Utilizing an Advocacy Coalition Framework, questions about the ideological motivations behind different forms of school choice, the particular programs that certain groups are likely to support or oppose, and the strategies - including the potential alliances and coalitions - that are increasingly employed around school choice policy are explored. A framework for understanding and analyzing policymaking in this area is offered, extending existing thinking on both school choice issues and education policy more generally.
AB - This article provides an updated analysis of the institutional and organizational landscape surrounding the advocacy of and opposition to vouchers and other forms of school choice over the past decade at federal/national, state, and local levels. The politics of choice grew far more complex during the 1990s, with Republican control of Congress and the White House, the growth of the national charter school movement, congressional passage of pilot voucher programs, and the Supreme Court's 2002 Zelman v. Simmons-Harris ruling. Utilizing an Advocacy Coalition Framework, questions about the ideological motivations behind different forms of school choice, the particular programs that certain groups are likely to support or oppose, and the strategies - including the potential alliances and coalitions - that are increasingly employed around school choice policy are explored. A framework for understanding and analyzing policymaking in this area is offered, extending existing thinking on both school choice issues and education policy more generally.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34547219419&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34547219419&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/01619560701312947
DO - 10.1080/01619560701312947
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:34547219419
SN - 0161-956X
VL - 82
SP - 204
EP - 230
JO - Peabody Journal of Education
JF - Peabody Journal of Education
IS - 2-3
ER -