TY - JOUR
T1 - The influence of retail outlet and FSMA information on consumer perceptions of and willingness to pay for organic grape tomatoes
AU - Ellison, Brenna
AU - Bernard, John C.
AU - Paukett, Michelle
AU - Toensmeyer, Ulrich C.
N1 - This research project is part of Regional Project S-1050: Assessing the Consumer Behavior, Market Coordination and Performance of the Consumer-Oriented Fruit and Vegetable Sector and was partially funded by USDA NIFA # ILLU-470-356 . The authors wish to thank Nicole Wagner, Pam Heinrichs, and Mary Christoph for help running the experiments.
PY - 2016/8/1
Y1 - 2016/8/1
N2 - The primary objective of this research was to determine the effect of retail outlet (supercenter, supermarket, farmers market, fresh format) on consumer perceptions of and willingness to pay (WTP) for organic grape tomatoes. Also examined was whether information on the proposed Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) regulations, with and without information on tomato safety, altered these aspects across retail outlets. Field experiments were conducted with 207 participants in two U.S. states in fall 2014 to address these questions. Consumers’ perceptions and WTP varied significantly by retail outlet, with farmers markets and fresh format stores receiving the most favorable evaluations and supercenters the least. With FSMA information, safety perceptions fell significantly for the favored outlets and mostly increased for supercenters. Participants’ felt no producers should be exempt from the FSMA and viewed farmers markets vendors as most likely to be exempt. Unexpectedly though, these changes seldom translated into changes in WTP. Further, in treatments with added tomato safety information, supercenters saw no safety rating benefit. Overall, it was clear the organic label was not viewed equally across different retail outlets.
AB - The primary objective of this research was to determine the effect of retail outlet (supercenter, supermarket, farmers market, fresh format) on consumer perceptions of and willingness to pay (WTP) for organic grape tomatoes. Also examined was whether information on the proposed Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA) regulations, with and without information on tomato safety, altered these aspects across retail outlets. Field experiments were conducted with 207 participants in two U.S. states in fall 2014 to address these questions. Consumers’ perceptions and WTP varied significantly by retail outlet, with farmers markets and fresh format stores receiving the most favorable evaluations and supercenters the least. With FSMA information, safety perceptions fell significantly for the favored outlets and mostly increased for supercenters. Participants’ felt no producers should be exempt from the FSMA and viewed farmers markets vendors as most likely to be exempt. Unexpectedly though, these changes seldom translated into changes in WTP. Further, in treatments with added tomato safety information, supercenters saw no safety rating benefit. Overall, it was clear the organic label was not viewed equally across different retail outlets.
KW - Field experiment
KW - Food Safety Modernization Act
KW - Organic
KW - Retail outlet
KW - Willingness to pay
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84969504586&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84969504586&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.joep.2016.05.002
DO - 10.1016/j.joep.2016.05.002
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84969504586
SN - 0167-4870
VL - 55
SP - 109
EP - 119
JO - Journal of Economic Psychology
JF - Journal of Economic Psychology
ER -