TY - JOUR
T1 - The importance of localized culling in stabilizing chronic wasting disease prevalence in white-tailed deer populations
AU - Manjerovic, Mary Beth
AU - Green, Michelle L.
AU - Mateus-Pinilla, Nohra
AU - Novakofski, Jan
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported by the US Fish & Wildlife Service Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration Project (W-146-R) and the University of Illinois Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research . Illinois data obtained from annual chronic wasting disease reports were downloaded from http://dnr.state.il.us/cwd/; Wisconsin data were downloaded from http://dnr.wi.gov/topic/wildlifehabitat/results.html . The authors wish to thank the Illinois Department of Natural Resources and the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources for the public services they provide in managing CWD, for collecting samples, and managing and sharing data. The authors also thank the hunting communities in Illinois and Wisconsin for their efforts to collect samples and their willingness to have their deer tested for CWD. In addition, the authors thank W. Brown for generating the maps used in this manuscript and multiple colleagues for review of this manuscript.
PY - 2014
Y1 - 2014
N2 - Strategies to contain the spread of disease often are developed with incomplete knowledge of the possible outcomes but are intended to minimize the risks associated with delaying control. Culling of game species by government agencies is one approach to control disease in wild populations but is unpopular with hunters and wildlife enthusiasts, politically unpalatable, and erodes public support for agencies responsible for wildlife management. We addressed the functional differences between hunting and government culling programs for managing chronic wasting disease (CWD) in white-tailed deer by comparing prevalence over a 10-year period in Illinois and Wisconsin. When both Illinois and Wisconsin were actively culling from 2003 - 2007, there were no statistical differences between state CWD prevalence estimates. Wisconsin government culling concluded in 2007 and average prevalence over the next five years was 3.09 ± 1.13% with an average annual increase of 0.63%. During that same time period, Illinois continued government culling and there was no change in prevalence throughout Illinois. Despite its unpopularity among hunters, localized culling is a disease management strategy that can maintain low disease prevalence while minimizing impacts on recreational deer harvest.
AB - Strategies to contain the spread of disease often are developed with incomplete knowledge of the possible outcomes but are intended to minimize the risks associated with delaying control. Culling of game species by government agencies is one approach to control disease in wild populations but is unpopular with hunters and wildlife enthusiasts, politically unpalatable, and erodes public support for agencies responsible for wildlife management. We addressed the functional differences between hunting and government culling programs for managing chronic wasting disease (CWD) in white-tailed deer by comparing prevalence over a 10-year period in Illinois and Wisconsin. When both Illinois and Wisconsin were actively culling from 2003 - 2007, there were no statistical differences between state CWD prevalence estimates. Wisconsin government culling concluded in 2007 and average prevalence over the next five years was 3.09 ± 1.13% with an average annual increase of 0.63%. During that same time period, Illinois continued government culling and there was no change in prevalence throughout Illinois. Despite its unpopularity among hunters, localized culling is a disease management strategy that can maintain low disease prevalence while minimizing impacts on recreational deer harvest.
KW - Chronic wasting disease
KW - Culling
KW - Disease management
KW - Prevalence
KW - Prion
KW - White-tailed deer
KW - Wildlife
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84888206046&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84888206046&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2013.09.011
DO - 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2013.09.011
M3 - Article
C2 - 24128754
AN - SCOPUS:84888206046
SN - 0167-5877
VL - 113
SP - 139
EP - 145
JO - Preventive Veterinary Medicine
JF - Preventive Veterinary Medicine
IS - 1
ER -