Abstract
In the United States, among the most common responses to justiciable problems – non-trivial problems that raise civil legal issues – is to do nothing. The probability of taking no action varies inversely with income, with poor households least likely to take any action to attempt to resolve problems. In focus groups comprised of low- and low-moderate income residents of a Midwestern American city, respondents were asked to discuss experiences of justiciable problems involving money or housing, including problems about which they did nothing. Five rationales for inaction emerged: shame, a sense of insufficient power, fear, gratitude, and frustrated resignation. Three themes – fear, gratitude and frustrated resignation – reflected lessons from people’s past experiences with justiciable problems. These themes suggest new, richer explanations for socio-economic differences in how such problems are handled.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Transforming Lives |
| Subtitle of host publication | Law and Social Process |
| Editors | Pascoe Pleasence, Alexy Buck, Nigel J Balmer |
| Publisher | Legal Services Commission |
| Pages | 112-132 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9780117021464 |
| State | Published - 2007 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Importance of Doing Nothing: Everyday Problems and Responses of Inaction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS