Abstract
Grounded in the values congruence proposition, this study examined the interplay between leadership styles and corporate social responsibility (CSR) motives in different crisis contexts. The results of a 2 (crisis type) × 2 (leadership style) × 2 (CSR motives) between-subjects experiment showed that the congruent combination of leadership styles and CSR motives maximized the insulating effect of CSR practice but only when the crisis type was victim. In a victim crisis, utilizing intrinsic CSR motives gained greater word-of-mouth intention and purchase intention when combined with transformational leadership than with transactional leadership. In a preventable crisis, the positive effect of values congruence disappeared and even backfired. More specifically, the congruence between transactional leadership and extrinsic CSR motives amplified the negative impact of a crisis. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 92-123 |
Number of pages | 32 |
Journal | Management Communication Quarterly |
Volume | 36 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Feb 2022 |
Keywords
- corporate social responsibility
- crisis type
- persuasion knowledge model
- transactional leadership
- transformational leadership
- values congruence
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Communication
- Strategy and Management