TY - JOUR
T1 - The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Gender-Based Violence in the United States
T2 - Framework and Policy Recommendations
AU - Rieger, Agnes
AU - Blackburn, Allyson M.
AU - Bystrynski, Jonathan B.
AU - Garthe, Rachel C.
AU - Allen, Nicole E.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021. American Psychological Association
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Objective: In response to the 2019 novel coronavirus pandemic, portions of the U.S. government implemented social distancing policies that, while necessary, yield unintended consequences. This article explores how risk for gender-based violence (GBV) has been exacerbated across the social-ecological model (SEM; e.g., by increasing economic stress and decreasing social support) and highlights differential impact across social locations (e.g., considering race, gender, social class). Method: Drawing on gender-based violence prevention and response research, considerations for researchers, policymakers, and practitioners are delineated. Results: A comprehensive framework adapting an intersectional lens and the SEM is used to explain the changes in risk and protective factors for GBV. Policy recommendations that serve to augment (not replace) social distancing policies are proposed. Conclusion: The pandemic has uprooted life in a way that impacts GBV prevention and response. Yet, this is also an opportunity to define a new way forward rather than return to “business as usual”; psychologists should strive to improve social services by utilizing the SEM and intersectionality.
AB - Objective: In response to the 2019 novel coronavirus pandemic, portions of the U.S. government implemented social distancing policies that, while necessary, yield unintended consequences. This article explores how risk for gender-based violence (GBV) has been exacerbated across the social-ecological model (SEM; e.g., by increasing economic stress and decreasing social support) and highlights differential impact across social locations (e.g., considering race, gender, social class). Method: Drawing on gender-based violence prevention and response research, considerations for researchers, policymakers, and practitioners are delineated. Results: A comprehensive framework adapting an intersectional lens and the SEM is used to explain the changes in risk and protective factors for GBV. Policy recommendations that serve to augment (not replace) social distancing policies are proposed. Conclusion: The pandemic has uprooted life in a way that impacts GBV prevention and response. Yet, this is also an opportunity to define a new way forward rather than return to “business as usual”; psychologists should strive to improve social services by utilizing the SEM and intersectionality.
KW - Covid-19
KW - Gender-based violence
KW - Intersectionality
KW - Social-ecological model
KW - Systems response
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85124850778&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85124850778&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1037/tra0001056
DO - 10.1037/tra0001056
M3 - Article
C2 - 34323567
AN - SCOPUS:85124850778
SN - 1942-9681
VL - 14
SP - 471
EP - 479
JO - Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy
JF - Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy
IS - 3
ER -