The impact of guaranteed tuition policies on postsecondary tuition levels: A difference-in-difference approach

Jennifer A. Delaney, Tyler D. Kearney

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This study considers the impact of state-level guaranteed tuition programs on postsecondary tuition levels. The analytic framework argues that state-level laws requiring flat tuition rates for four years contain inflationary risk, which encourages institutions to set tuition higher than they otherwise would with annual adjustments. To empirically test this idea, this study uses a national panel dataset and a quasi-experimental difference-in-difference methodological approach, with Illinois' Truth-in-Tuition law serving as the treatment condition. On average, institutions subject to this law increased annual tuition by approximately 26-30% and aggregate four-year tuition by approximately 6-7% in excess of the amount predicted by the trend for institutions not subject to the law. These findings are robust to multiple alternative specifications and support the idea that state-level guaranteed tuition programs encourage large institutional tuition increases. Implications of these findings for state policymakers, higher education institutional leaders, and college-age students and their families are also discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)80-99
Number of pages20
JournalEconomics of Education Review
Volume47
DOIs
StatePublished - 2015

Keywords

  • Difference-in-difference
  • Finance
  • Higher education
  • Policy
  • Quasi-experimental analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Economics and Econometrics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The impact of guaranteed tuition policies on postsecondary tuition levels: A difference-in-difference approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this