The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: Meta-analysis of individual consequences and mechanisms of distributed work

Ravi S. Gajendran, David A. Harrison

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperpeer-review

Abstract

What knowledge do we have about the reliable positive and negative consequences of telecommuting? How do these consequences come about? What actions can we recommend based on research evidence? We answer these questions through a meta-analysis of 38 studies involving 10711 employees working in natural contexts. Telecommuting has small but favorable effects on task related and workfamily outcomes. Its beneficial consequences are partially transmitted through increases in perceived autonomy and they tend to be accentuated when telecommuting is more frequent (higher intensity). Telecommuting also has no clear-cut, detrimental effects on the quality of workplace relationships or individual prospects for career advancement. However, higher intensity telecommuting does harm relationships with coworkers (but not supervisors). Results provide building blocks for a more complex and complete theoretical treatment of telecommuting. They also suggest research based actions that HR practitioners and public policy makers can implement to maximize benefits from telecommuting.

Original languageEnglish (US)
StatePublished - 2006
Event66th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, AOM 2006 - Atlanta, GA, United States
Duration: Aug 11 2006Aug 16 2006

Other

Other66th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, AOM 2006
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CityAtlanta, GA
Period8/11/068/16/06

Keywords

  • Distributed work
  • Meta-analysis
  • Telecommuting

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Management Information Systems
  • Management of Technology and Innovation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: Meta-analysis of individual consequences and mechanisms of distributed work'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this