TY - JOUR
T1 - The general equilibrium incidence of environmental taxes
AU - Fullerton, Don
AU - Heutel, Garth
N1 - Funding Information:
We are grateful for funding from the AERE, the University of Texas, the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program, and Japan's Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI). For helpful suggestions, we thank John List, Gib Metcalf, Ian Parry, Kerry Smith, Chris Timmins, Rob Williams, and seminar participants at the University of Texas at Austin, the 2004 AERE Workshop in Estes Park, CO, and Camp Resources XII in Wilmington, NC. This paper is part of the NBER's research program in Public Economics. Any opinions expressed are those of the authors and not those of the AERE, UT, the NSF, ESRI, or the National Bureau of Economic Research.
PY - 2007/4
Y1 - 2007/4
N2 - We study the distributional effects of a pollution tax in general equilibrium, with general forms of substitution where pollution might be a relative complement or substitute for labor or for capital in production. We find closed form solutions for pollution, output prices, and factor prices. Various special cases help clarify the impact of differential factor intensities, substitution effects, and output effects. Intuitively, the pollution tax might place disproportionate burdens on capital if the polluting sector is capital intensive, or if labor is a better substitute for pollution than is capital; however, conditions are found where these intuitive results do not hold. We show exact conditions for the wage to rise relative to the capital return. Plausible values are then assigned to all the parameters, and we find that variations over the possible range of factor intensities have less impact than variations over the possible range of elasticities.
AB - We study the distributional effects of a pollution tax in general equilibrium, with general forms of substitution where pollution might be a relative complement or substitute for labor or for capital in production. We find closed form solutions for pollution, output prices, and factor prices. Various special cases help clarify the impact of differential factor intensities, substitution effects, and output effects. Intuitively, the pollution tax might place disproportionate burdens on capital if the polluting sector is capital intensive, or if labor is a better substitute for pollution than is capital; however, conditions are found where these intuitive results do not hold. We show exact conditions for the wage to rise relative to the capital return. Plausible values are then assigned to all the parameters, and we find that variations over the possible range of factor intensities have less impact than variations over the possible range of elasticities.
KW - Analytical solutions
KW - Distributional burdens
KW - Pollution policy
KW - Sources side
KW - Uses side
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33847054716&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33847054716&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2006.07.004
DO - 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2006.07.004
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:33847054716
SN - 0047-2727
VL - 91
SP - 571
EP - 591
JO - Journal of Public Economics
JF - Journal of Public Economics
IS - 3-4
ER -