Abstract
In overlapping generations models, money growth creates intergenerational wealth effects and leads to the breakdown of the Friedman rule; the rule can be restored via lump-sum tax and transfers that neutralize these wealth transfers. Additionally, and in contrast to money-in-the-utility-function models, the Friedman rule is not the unique first-best solution in cash-in-advance-constraint models of money: a continuum of combinations of money growth rates and consumption taxes implement the first-best allocation. This paper traces through the intellectual origins of the first (old) result, which was recently restated in Bhattacharya, et al. [2005. Monetary policy, fiscal policy, and the inflation tax: equivalence results. Macroeconomic Dynamics 7, 647-669.] and formally demonstrates the second (new) result.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 581-589 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | Journal of Monetary Economics |
Volume | 54 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Mar 2007 |
Keywords
- Friedman rule
- Intergenerational wealth effects
- Overlapping generations
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Finance
- Economics and Econometrics