Abstract
Although the authors do a valuable service by elucidating the pitfalls of inferring top-down effects, they overreach by claiming that vision is cognitively impenetrable. Their argument, and the entire question of cognitive penetrability, seems rooted in a discrete, stage-like model of the mind that is unsupported by neural data.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | e231 |
| Journal | The Behavioral and brain sciences |
| Volume | 39 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jan 1 2016 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
- Physiology
- Behavioral Neuroscience