Abstract
The controversies surrounding the evidence-based research movement are reviewed from a critical pedagogy framework. Standards for assessing quality are forms of interpretive practice that enact a politics of evidence and truth. Moral and ethical criteria for judging qualitative research are reviewed.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 139-160 |
| Number of pages | 22 |
| Journal | Qualitative Research |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2009 |
Keywords
- Ethics
- Evidence
- Policy
- Politics
- Praxis
- Standards
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
- History and Philosophy of Science
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The elephant in the living room: Or extending the conversation about the politics of evidence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS