Abstract
Although consumer skepticism about corporate social responsibility (CSR) is on the rise, research is sparse on the psychological dynamics of this skepticism, particularly when CSR communication serves as a company's crisis response strategy. Employing two between-subjects design experiments, this study aims to fill this gap by looking at the role consumer CSR skepticism plays in consumer reactions to CSR communications in different types of crises. The study 1 results show that dispositional CSR skepticism did not moderate the effect of crisis type on attitudes and intentions when CSR was used as a post-crisis response strategy. The study 2 findings, however, indicated that situational CSR skepticism significantly mediated the impact of crisis type and CSR motives on purchase intentions only when the crisis stemmed from some accidental rather than preventable circumstance. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Article number | 101792 |
Journal | Public Relations Review |
Volume | 46 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jun 2020 |
Keywords
- CSR motives
- Corporate social responsibility (CSR)
- Dispositional and situational skepticism
- Persuasion Knowledge Model (PKM)
- Situational Crisis Communication Theory (SCCT)
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Communication
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Marketing