The Effectiveness of Payments for Environmental Services

Jan Börner, Katherine R Baylis, Esteve Corbera, Driss Ezzine-de-Blas, Jordi Honey-Rosés, U. Martin Persson, Sven Wunder

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

We adopt a theory-based approach to synthesize research on the effectiveness of payments for environmental services in achieving environmental objectives and socio-economic co-benefits in varying contexts. Our theory of change builds on established conceptual models of impact pathways and highlights the role of (1) contextual dimensions (e.g., political, institutional, and socio-economic conditions, spatial heterogeneity in environmental service values and provision costs, and interactions with pre-existing policies), and (2) scheme design (e.g., payment type and level, contract length, targeting, and differentiation of payments) in determining environmental and socio-economic outcomes. To shed light on the overall effectiveness of payment schemes, and its determinants, we review counterfactual-based empirical evaluations, comparative analyses of case-studies, and meta-analyses. Our review suggests that program effectiveness often lags behind the expectations of early theorists. However, we also find that theory has advanced sufficiently to identify common reasons for why payment schemes fail or succeed. Moreover, payment schemes are often rolled out along with other policy instruments in so-called policy mixes. Advances in theory and evaluation research are needed to improve our understanding of how such policy mixes interact with the targeted social-ecological systems.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)359-374
Number of pages16
JournalWorld Development
Volume96
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2017

Fingerprint

economics
evaluation research
ecological system
environmental economics
economic conditions
social system
targeting
determinants
services
Payment
Payments for environmental services
costs
interaction
evaluation
cost
policy
socioeconomics
Values
Socio-economics
Policy mix

Keywords

  • environmental effectiveness
  • impact evaluation
  • payments for ecosystem services
  • policy design
  • trade-offs

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Development
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

Börner, J., Baylis, K. R., Corbera, E., Ezzine-de-Blas, D., Honey-Rosés, J., Persson, U. M., & Wunder, S. (2017). The Effectiveness of Payments for Environmental Services. World Development, 96, 359-374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.03.020

The Effectiveness of Payments for Environmental Services. / Börner, Jan; Baylis, Katherine R; Corbera, Esteve; Ezzine-de-Blas, Driss; Honey-Rosés, Jordi; Persson, U. Martin; Wunder, Sven.

In: World Development, Vol. 96, 01.08.2017, p. 359-374.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Börner, J, Baylis, KR, Corbera, E, Ezzine-de-Blas, D, Honey-Rosés, J, Persson, UM & Wunder, S 2017, 'The Effectiveness of Payments for Environmental Services', World Development, vol. 96, pp. 359-374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.03.020
Börner J, Baylis KR, Corbera E, Ezzine-de-Blas D, Honey-Rosés J, Persson UM et al. The Effectiveness of Payments for Environmental Services. World Development. 2017 Aug 1;96:359-374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.03.020
Börner, Jan ; Baylis, Katherine R ; Corbera, Esteve ; Ezzine-de-Blas, Driss ; Honey-Rosés, Jordi ; Persson, U. Martin ; Wunder, Sven. / The Effectiveness of Payments for Environmental Services. In: World Development. 2017 ; Vol. 96. pp. 359-374.
@article{bef1b84d8da8495fba5427c5d0d9eeec,
title = "The Effectiveness of Payments for Environmental Services",
abstract = "We adopt a theory-based approach to synthesize research on the effectiveness of payments for environmental services in achieving environmental objectives and socio-economic co-benefits in varying contexts. Our theory of change builds on established conceptual models of impact pathways and highlights the role of (1) contextual dimensions (e.g., political, institutional, and socio-economic conditions, spatial heterogeneity in environmental service values and provision costs, and interactions with pre-existing policies), and (2) scheme design (e.g., payment type and level, contract length, targeting, and differentiation of payments) in determining environmental and socio-economic outcomes. To shed light on the overall effectiveness of payment schemes, and its determinants, we review counterfactual-based empirical evaluations, comparative analyses of case-studies, and meta-analyses. Our review suggests that program effectiveness often lags behind the expectations of early theorists. However, we also find that theory has advanced sufficiently to identify common reasons for why payment schemes fail or succeed. Moreover, payment schemes are often rolled out along with other policy instruments in so-called policy mixes. Advances in theory and evaluation research are needed to improve our understanding of how such policy mixes interact with the targeted social-ecological systems.",
keywords = "environmental effectiveness, impact evaluation, payments for ecosystem services, policy design, trade-offs",
author = "Jan B{\"o}rner and Baylis, {Katherine R} and Esteve Corbera and Driss Ezzine-de-Blas and Jordi Honey-Ros{\'e}s and Persson, {U. Martin} and Sven Wunder",
year = "2017",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.03.020",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "96",
pages = "359--374",
journal = "World Development",
issn = "1873-5991",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Effectiveness of Payments for Environmental Services

AU - Börner, Jan

AU - Baylis, Katherine R

AU - Corbera, Esteve

AU - Ezzine-de-Blas, Driss

AU - Honey-Rosés, Jordi

AU - Persson, U. Martin

AU - Wunder, Sven

PY - 2017/8/1

Y1 - 2017/8/1

N2 - We adopt a theory-based approach to synthesize research on the effectiveness of payments for environmental services in achieving environmental objectives and socio-economic co-benefits in varying contexts. Our theory of change builds on established conceptual models of impact pathways and highlights the role of (1) contextual dimensions (e.g., political, institutional, and socio-economic conditions, spatial heterogeneity in environmental service values and provision costs, and interactions with pre-existing policies), and (2) scheme design (e.g., payment type and level, contract length, targeting, and differentiation of payments) in determining environmental and socio-economic outcomes. To shed light on the overall effectiveness of payment schemes, and its determinants, we review counterfactual-based empirical evaluations, comparative analyses of case-studies, and meta-analyses. Our review suggests that program effectiveness often lags behind the expectations of early theorists. However, we also find that theory has advanced sufficiently to identify common reasons for why payment schemes fail or succeed. Moreover, payment schemes are often rolled out along with other policy instruments in so-called policy mixes. Advances in theory and evaluation research are needed to improve our understanding of how such policy mixes interact with the targeted social-ecological systems.

AB - We adopt a theory-based approach to synthesize research on the effectiveness of payments for environmental services in achieving environmental objectives and socio-economic co-benefits in varying contexts. Our theory of change builds on established conceptual models of impact pathways and highlights the role of (1) contextual dimensions (e.g., political, institutional, and socio-economic conditions, spatial heterogeneity in environmental service values and provision costs, and interactions with pre-existing policies), and (2) scheme design (e.g., payment type and level, contract length, targeting, and differentiation of payments) in determining environmental and socio-economic outcomes. To shed light on the overall effectiveness of payment schemes, and its determinants, we review counterfactual-based empirical evaluations, comparative analyses of case-studies, and meta-analyses. Our review suggests that program effectiveness often lags behind the expectations of early theorists. However, we also find that theory has advanced sufficiently to identify common reasons for why payment schemes fail or succeed. Moreover, payment schemes are often rolled out along with other policy instruments in so-called policy mixes. Advances in theory and evaluation research are needed to improve our understanding of how such policy mixes interact with the targeted social-ecological systems.

KW - environmental effectiveness

KW - impact evaluation

KW - payments for ecosystem services

KW - policy design

KW - trade-offs

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85017249112&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85017249112&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.03.020

DO - 10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.03.020

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85017249112

VL - 96

SP - 359

EP - 374

JO - World Development

JF - World Development

SN - 1873-5991

ER -