The Effect of Humanizing Robo-Advisors on Investor Judgments

Frank Douglas Hodge, Kim I. Mendoza, Roshan Sinha

Research output: Working paper

Abstract

Using an experiment, we examine the effect of humanizing robo-advisors (computer algorithms that provide financial advice) on investor judgments. We find that investors are more likely to follow the advice of a robo-advisor when the advisor exhibits fewer human characteristics, whereas they are more likely to follow the advice of a human advisor when the advisor exhibits more human characteristics. We also find that after learning that the advisor’s recommendation underperformed other investment options, investors decrease their reliance on subsequent recommendations the most in two conditions: when the advisor is a robo-advisor with fewer human characteristics, and when the advisor is a human advisor with more human characteristics. Finally, in support of our theory, we find that advisor credibility mediates the relationship between the likelihood of following the advisor’s recommendation and the interaction between the type of advisor and level of humanization. Our findings contribute to the literature examining how technology influences the acquisition and use of financial information and the general literature on human-computer interactions. Our study also addresses a call by the SEC to learn more about the use of robo-advisors. Lastly, our study has practical implications for wealth management firms as they increase their use of robo-advisors.
Original languageEnglish (US)
Number of pages42
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 25 2018

Fingerprint

Investors
Advisors
Experiment
Wealth
Human-computer interaction
Credibility
Financial information
Interaction

Keywords

  • Humanizing Technology
  • Financial Advisors
  • Investment Decisions
  • Robo-Advisors

Cite this

The Effect of Humanizing Robo-Advisors on Investor Judgments. / Hodge, Frank Douglas; Mendoza, Kim I.; Sinha, Roshan.

2018.

Research output: Working paper

@techreport{2225b0e15a2f47fdaff5afbf2d557362,
title = "The Effect of Humanizing Robo-Advisors on Investor Judgments",
abstract = "Using an experiment, we examine the effect of humanizing robo-advisors (computer algorithms that provide financial advice) on investor judgments. We find that investors are more likely to follow the advice of a robo-advisor when the advisor exhibits fewer human characteristics, whereas they are more likely to follow the advice of a human advisor when the advisor exhibits more human characteristics. We also find that after learning that the advisor’s recommendation underperformed other investment options, investors decrease their reliance on subsequent recommendations the most in two conditions: when the advisor is a robo-advisor with fewer human characteristics, and when the advisor is a human advisor with more human characteristics. Finally, in support of our theory, we find that advisor credibility mediates the relationship between the likelihood of following the advisor’s recommendation and the interaction between the type of advisor and level of humanization. Our findings contribute to the literature examining how technology influences the acquisition and use of financial information and the general literature on human-computer interactions. Our study also addresses a call by the SEC to learn more about the use of robo-advisors. Lastly, our study has practical implications for wealth management firms as they increase their use of robo-advisors.",
keywords = "Humanizing Technology, Financial Advisors, Investment Decisions, Robo-Advisors",
author = "Hodge, {Frank Douglas} and Mendoza, {Kim I.} and Roshan Sinha",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "25",
doi = "10.2139/ssrn.3158004",
language = "English (US)",
type = "WorkingPaper",

}

TY - UNPB

T1 - The Effect of Humanizing Robo-Advisors on Investor Judgments

AU - Hodge, Frank Douglas

AU - Mendoza, Kim I.

AU - Sinha, Roshan

PY - 2018/4/25

Y1 - 2018/4/25

N2 - Using an experiment, we examine the effect of humanizing robo-advisors (computer algorithms that provide financial advice) on investor judgments. We find that investors are more likely to follow the advice of a robo-advisor when the advisor exhibits fewer human characteristics, whereas they are more likely to follow the advice of a human advisor when the advisor exhibits more human characteristics. We also find that after learning that the advisor’s recommendation underperformed other investment options, investors decrease their reliance on subsequent recommendations the most in two conditions: when the advisor is a robo-advisor with fewer human characteristics, and when the advisor is a human advisor with more human characteristics. Finally, in support of our theory, we find that advisor credibility mediates the relationship between the likelihood of following the advisor’s recommendation and the interaction between the type of advisor and level of humanization. Our findings contribute to the literature examining how technology influences the acquisition and use of financial information and the general literature on human-computer interactions. Our study also addresses a call by the SEC to learn more about the use of robo-advisors. Lastly, our study has practical implications for wealth management firms as they increase their use of robo-advisors.

AB - Using an experiment, we examine the effect of humanizing robo-advisors (computer algorithms that provide financial advice) on investor judgments. We find that investors are more likely to follow the advice of a robo-advisor when the advisor exhibits fewer human characteristics, whereas they are more likely to follow the advice of a human advisor when the advisor exhibits more human characteristics. We also find that after learning that the advisor’s recommendation underperformed other investment options, investors decrease their reliance on subsequent recommendations the most in two conditions: when the advisor is a robo-advisor with fewer human characteristics, and when the advisor is a human advisor with more human characteristics. Finally, in support of our theory, we find that advisor credibility mediates the relationship between the likelihood of following the advisor’s recommendation and the interaction between the type of advisor and level of humanization. Our findings contribute to the literature examining how technology influences the acquisition and use of financial information and the general literature on human-computer interactions. Our study also addresses a call by the SEC to learn more about the use of robo-advisors. Lastly, our study has practical implications for wealth management firms as they increase their use of robo-advisors.

KW - Humanizing Technology

KW - Financial Advisors

KW - Investment Decisions

KW - Robo-Advisors

U2 - 10.2139/ssrn.3158004

DO - 10.2139/ssrn.3158004

M3 - Working paper

BT - The Effect of Humanizing Robo-Advisors on Investor Judgments

ER -