The Effect of Gender on Awards in Employment Arbitration Cases: The Experience in the Securities Industry

David B. Lipsky, J. Ryan Lamare, Abhishek Gupta

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In this article we analyze the outcomes of nearly 3200 awards issued in employment disputes settled by arbitration in the securities industry over the period 1986-2008. The large amount of litigation in the securities industry alleging discrimination by securities firms against the women they employ led us to hypothesize that women would do less well than men in these arbitration cases. Regression analysis reveals that the gender of the complainant and the complainant's attorney (but not the gender of the respondent's attorney or the arbitrator) had significant effects on the size of the awards. Regardless of the definition of the dependent variable, female complainants did less well than male complainants in these employment arbitration cases. In most estimates, the gender of the attorney representing the complainant also affected the size of the award: male attorneys obtained larger awards than female attorneys. We conclude that these gender differentials are more likely to be the consequence of employment conditions in the securities industry rather than biases in the arbitration process.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)314-342
Number of pages29
JournalIndustrial Relations
Volume52
Issue numberSUPPL.1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2013
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Industrial relations
  • Strategy and Management
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Management of Technology and Innovation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Effect of Gender on Awards in Employment Arbitration Cases: The Experience in the Securities Industry'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this