The Dynamic Relationship Between Accuracy and Bias in Social Perception Research

Chadly Stern, Tessa V. West, Antoinette Schoenthaler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


How do perceivers make accurate social judgments? A substantial amount of evidence suggests that perceivers' judgments are often quite accurate even when they do not have direct access to the truth, in part because they make judgments through biased processes. In the present article, we examine the dynamic relationship between bias and accuracy in social perception research. We outline how bias and accuracy are theoretically and empirically distinct processes and describe the importance (and difficulty) of defining and measuring both truth variables and bias variables in order to make empirical conclusions in accuracy research. Additionally, we examine how both bias variables (e.g., stereotypes, perceivers' own beliefs) and truth variables exert an influence on how perceivers make social judgments, as well as the extent to which judgments are accurate. Lastly, we provide steps that researchers can take in order to examine the relationship between bias and accuracy in their own research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)303-314
Number of pages12
JournalSocial and Personality Psychology Compass
Issue number5
StatePublished - May 1 2013
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The Dynamic Relationship Between Accuracy and Bias in Social Perception Research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this