The distribution of campaign spending benefits across groups

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


Coleman and Manna (2000) argue that campaign spending boosts the quality of democracy by increasing citizen knowledge about and affect toward candidates. If politically and socially advantaged groups disproportionately capture these knowledge benefits, however, then campaign spending merely perpetuates political inequality. Examining challenger and incumbent spending in 1996, I estimate the distribution of campaign spending benefits and find that these benefits are distributed broadly across advantaged and disadvantaged groups. In this regard, campaign spending is a democratizing force.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)916-934
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Politics
Issue number3
StatePublished - Aug 2001
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science


Dive into the research topics of 'The distribution of campaign spending benefits across groups'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this