TY - JOUR
T1 - The Development of the Commutativity Principle and Economical Addition Strategies
AU - Baroody, Arthur J.
AU - Gannon, Kathleen E.
N1 - Funding Information:
Preparation of this paper was supported, in part, by a PubIic Health Service grant (No. HD16757-01) to the first author from NICHD (NIH). An earlier version of the paper was presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, April 1983.
Copyright:
Copyright 2016 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 1984/6/1
Y1 - 1984/6/1
N2 - What is the relationship between the principle of commutativity and the development of addition strategies that disregard addend order? It has been proposed that the assumption (Conjecture 1) or discovery (Conjecture 2) of commutativity is a necessary condition for the invention of such advanced addition strategies. A third hypothesis suggests that children may invent labor-saving addition strategies without necessarily appreciating the commutativity principle. This study tested the three conjectures by evaluating 36 kindergartners on two types of commutativity tasks. Both tasks involved predicting whether commuted and noncommuted pairs of problems would produce the same or different answers. Over two sessions, addition strategies were also determined. Commutativity was not naturally assumed by children (as proposed by Conjecture 1), but appeared to be discovered. However, contrary to Conjecture 2 and consistent with Conjecture 3, an understanding of commutativity was not evident in all those who invented labor-saving addition strategies. This study also confirmed that counting-all starting with the larger addend—a mental strategy recently discovered in a case study—was not an uncommon labor-saving device among young children.
AB - What is the relationship between the principle of commutativity and the development of addition strategies that disregard addend order? It has been proposed that the assumption (Conjecture 1) or discovery (Conjecture 2) of commutativity is a necessary condition for the invention of such advanced addition strategies. A third hypothesis suggests that children may invent labor-saving addition strategies without necessarily appreciating the commutativity principle. This study tested the three conjectures by evaluating 36 kindergartners on two types of commutativity tasks. Both tasks involved predicting whether commuted and noncommuted pairs of problems would produce the same or different answers. Over two sessions, addition strategies were also determined. Commutativity was not naturally assumed by children (as proposed by Conjecture 1), but appeared to be discovered. However, contrary to Conjecture 2 and consistent with Conjecture 3, an understanding of commutativity was not evident in all those who invented labor-saving addition strategies. This study also confirmed that counting-all starting with the larger addend—a mental strategy recently discovered in a case study—was not an uncommon labor-saving device among young children.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84963145316&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84963145316&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1207/s1532690xci0103_3
DO - 10.1207/s1532690xci0103_3
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84963145316
SN - 0737-0008
VL - 1
SP - 321
EP - 339
JO - Cognition and Instruction
JF - Cognition and Instruction
IS - 3
ER -