The death of consumer bankruptcy in the United States

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Introduction Consumer bankruptcy in the United States as it has existed for over a century narrowly escaped death in the year 2000. But that venerable institution is on death row; only the execution date remains to be set. The 106th Congress passed a major bankruptcy ‘reform’ bill in December 2000. The fundamental purpose of the Reform Bill is to deny many consumer debtors an immediate discharge of their debts in a Chapter 7 liquidation bankruptcy, leaving only the Hobson’s choice of forgoing bankruptcy relief altogether or attempting to ‘repay their creditors the maximum that they can afford’ in a Chapter 13 repayment plan. Only a pocket veto of the Reform Bill by then-President William Clinton on 19 December 2000 granted a temporary reprieve. The salvation of consumer bankruptcy may be short-lived. If possible, the fate of traditional consumer bankruptcy has been hanging by an even more precarious thread in the 107th Congress than ever before. In March 2001, both chambers overwhelmingly passed slightly different versions of a bankruptcy reform bill. President George W. Bush has made it known that he supports the bankruptcy legislation and, unlike his predecessor, will sign a bankruptcy bill. All that apparently remained was for the House and the Senate to appoint conferees, reach a compromise in conference regarding the handful of differences in the two chambers’ passed bills, and present the conference version to the willing President for signature.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationInternational Perspectives on Consumers' Access to Justice
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages264-300
Number of pages37
ISBN (Electronic)9780511494833
ISBN (Print)052182432x, 9780521824323
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2003

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Social Sciences

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The death of consumer bankruptcy in the United States'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this