Abstract

Looking at Vladimir Men'shov’s Moscow Does Not Believe in Tears (1979), as well as other ‘stagnation’ era films, this article considers the cultural paradigms of ‘late socialism’ in their double context: the ‘sad comedies’ of the Brezhnev era on the one hand, and recent attempts to represent the final decades of the Soviet regime, on the other. The Brezhnev era paid for its relative stability with economic and cultural stagnation. No longer promising a ‘bright future’, Brezhnev-era films eradicated desire and taught the audience to be satisfied with the status quo. In this context, Men'shov’s Moscow Does Not Believe in Tears stands apart, because here desire itself is made visible, exposed as a force that constructs the subject and promises a future, that remains in play after the demand (of the state, of the Other) has been satisfied. In opposition to the films that came before it (such as Autumn Marathon and Irony of Fate) as well as the films that came after (such as The Vanished Empire and Cargo 200), Moscow Does Not Believe in Tears acknowledges the necessity of desire itself, its continuous movement toward an object always out of reach. In the cultural logic of late socialism, we might think of this as a futile attempt to undo the economic fetters of stagnation, to continue to search for an object that promises a future that may in fact be different from the eternity of the Soviet present.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)185-199
Number of pages15
JournalStudies in Russian and Soviet Cinema
Volume3
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2009

Fingerprint

socialism
stagnation
Economics
irony
economics
opposition
regime
paradigm
Logic
Socialism
present
demand
Tears
Moscow

Keywords

  • Desire
  • Late socialism
  • Moscow does not believe in tears
  • Nostalgia
  • Stagnation
  • The vanished empire

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Communication
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts

Cite this

The cultural logic of late socialism. / Kaganovsky, Lilya.

In: Studies in Russian and Soviet Cinema, Vol. 3, No. 2, 01.01.2009, p. 185-199.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{db85343cea0e4889a2bc4c44485f72ff,
title = "The cultural logic of late socialism",
abstract = "Looking at Vladimir Men'shov’s Moscow Does Not Believe in Tears (1979), as well as other ‘stagnation’ era films, this article considers the cultural paradigms of ‘late socialism’ in their double context: the ‘sad comedies’ of the Brezhnev era on the one hand, and recent attempts to represent the final decades of the Soviet regime, on the other. The Brezhnev era paid for its relative stability with economic and cultural stagnation. No longer promising a ‘bright future’, Brezhnev-era films eradicated desire and taught the audience to be satisfied with the status quo. In this context, Men'shov’s Moscow Does Not Believe in Tears stands apart, because here desire itself is made visible, exposed as a force that constructs the subject and promises a future, that remains in play after the demand (of the state, of the Other) has been satisfied. In opposition to the films that came before it (such as Autumn Marathon and Irony of Fate) as well as the films that came after (such as The Vanished Empire and Cargo 200), Moscow Does Not Believe in Tears acknowledges the necessity of desire itself, its continuous movement toward an object always out of reach. In the cultural logic of late socialism, we might think of this as a futile attempt to undo the economic fetters of stagnation, to continue to search for an object that promises a future that may in fact be different from the eternity of the Soviet present.",
keywords = "Desire, Late socialism, Moscow does not believe in tears, Nostalgia, Stagnation, The vanished empire",
author = "Lilya Kaganovsky",
year = "2009",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1386/srsc.3.2.185_1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
pages = "185--199",
journal = "Studies in Russian and Soviet Cinema",
issn = "1750-3132",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The cultural logic of late socialism

AU - Kaganovsky, Lilya

PY - 2009/1/1

Y1 - 2009/1/1

N2 - Looking at Vladimir Men'shov’s Moscow Does Not Believe in Tears (1979), as well as other ‘stagnation’ era films, this article considers the cultural paradigms of ‘late socialism’ in their double context: the ‘sad comedies’ of the Brezhnev era on the one hand, and recent attempts to represent the final decades of the Soviet regime, on the other. The Brezhnev era paid for its relative stability with economic and cultural stagnation. No longer promising a ‘bright future’, Brezhnev-era films eradicated desire and taught the audience to be satisfied with the status quo. In this context, Men'shov’s Moscow Does Not Believe in Tears stands apart, because here desire itself is made visible, exposed as a force that constructs the subject and promises a future, that remains in play after the demand (of the state, of the Other) has been satisfied. In opposition to the films that came before it (such as Autumn Marathon and Irony of Fate) as well as the films that came after (such as The Vanished Empire and Cargo 200), Moscow Does Not Believe in Tears acknowledges the necessity of desire itself, its continuous movement toward an object always out of reach. In the cultural logic of late socialism, we might think of this as a futile attempt to undo the economic fetters of stagnation, to continue to search for an object that promises a future that may in fact be different from the eternity of the Soviet present.

AB - Looking at Vladimir Men'shov’s Moscow Does Not Believe in Tears (1979), as well as other ‘stagnation’ era films, this article considers the cultural paradigms of ‘late socialism’ in their double context: the ‘sad comedies’ of the Brezhnev era on the one hand, and recent attempts to represent the final decades of the Soviet regime, on the other. The Brezhnev era paid for its relative stability with economic and cultural stagnation. No longer promising a ‘bright future’, Brezhnev-era films eradicated desire and taught the audience to be satisfied with the status quo. In this context, Men'shov’s Moscow Does Not Believe in Tears stands apart, because here desire itself is made visible, exposed as a force that constructs the subject and promises a future, that remains in play after the demand (of the state, of the Other) has been satisfied. In opposition to the films that came before it (such as Autumn Marathon and Irony of Fate) as well as the films that came after (such as The Vanished Empire and Cargo 200), Moscow Does Not Believe in Tears acknowledges the necessity of desire itself, its continuous movement toward an object always out of reach. In the cultural logic of late socialism, we might think of this as a futile attempt to undo the economic fetters of stagnation, to continue to search for an object that promises a future that may in fact be different from the eternity of the Soviet present.

KW - Desire

KW - Late socialism

KW - Moscow does not believe in tears

KW - Nostalgia

KW - Stagnation

KW - The vanished empire

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84864733003&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84864733003&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1386/srsc.3.2.185_1

DO - 10.1386/srsc.3.2.185_1

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84864733003

VL - 3

SP - 185

EP - 199

JO - Studies in Russian and Soviet Cinema

JF - Studies in Russian and Soviet Cinema

SN - 1750-3132

IS - 2

ER -