TY - JOUR
T1 - The Contagion of Interstate Violence
T2 - Reminders of Historical Interstate (but Not Intrastate) Violence Increase Support for Future Violence Against Unrelated Third-Party States
AU - Li, Mengyao
AU - Leidner, Bernhard
AU - Euh, Hyun
AU - Choi, Hoon Seok
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 by the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.
PY - 2016/8/1
Y1 - 2016/8/1
N2 - Five experiments investigated the war contagion phenomenon in the context of international relations, hypothesizing that reminders of past inter- (but not intra-) state war will increase support for future, unrelated interstate violence. After being reminded of the Korean War as an interstate rather than intrastate conflict, South Koreans showed stronger support for violent responses to new, unrelated interstate tensions (Study 1). Replicating this war contagion effect among Americans, we demonstrated that it was mediated by heightened perceived threat from, and negative images of, a fictitious country unrelated to the past war (Study 2), and moderated by national glorification (Study 3). Study 4, using another international conflict in the U.S. history, provided further conceptual replication. Finally, Study 5 included a baseline in addition to the inter- versus intrastate manipulation, yielding further support for the generalized effect of past interstate war reminders on preferences for aggressive approaches to new interstate tensions.
AB - Five experiments investigated the war contagion phenomenon in the context of international relations, hypothesizing that reminders of past inter- (but not intra-) state war will increase support for future, unrelated interstate violence. After being reminded of the Korean War as an interstate rather than intrastate conflict, South Koreans showed stronger support for violent responses to new, unrelated interstate tensions (Study 1). Replicating this war contagion effect among Americans, we demonstrated that it was mediated by heightened perceived threat from, and negative images of, a fictitious country unrelated to the past war (Study 2), and moderated by national glorification (Study 3). Study 4, using another international conflict in the U.S. history, provided further conceptual replication. Finally, Study 5 included a baseline in addition to the inter- versus intrastate manipulation, yielding further support for the generalized effect of past interstate war reminders on preferences for aggressive approaches to new interstate tensions.
KW - image
KW - ingroup identification/glorification
KW - intergroup threat
KW - interstate violence
KW - war contagion
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84977072571&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84977072571&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/0146167216649609
DO - 10.1177/0146167216649609
M3 - Article
C2 - 27257097
AN - SCOPUS:84977072571
SN - 0146-1672
VL - 42
SP - 1003
EP - 1024
JO - Personality and social psychology bulletin
JF - Personality and social psychology bulletin
IS - 8
ER -