Abstract
The social uprisings in the United States during the summer of 2020 renewed public discussion of forms of domination embed-ded into the social contracts of Western democracies. These discussions echo insights from within political philosophy regarding the domination contract. Despite numerous attempts to shed light on myriad aspects of the domination contract, an analysis of the role of colonialism and coloniality has yet to be sufficiently engaged by political philosophers, particularly within social contract theory. Drawing on the frameworks of intersectionality and decolonial feminism, this article examines the interweavings between two prominent domination contracts, the racia-sexual contract and the colonial contract, to better account for the systematic exclusion of Black, Indigenous, and other women of color (BIWOC) from lib-eral social contracts that are foundationally predicated on forms of gendered, racialized, colonial domination.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 366-381 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | Critical Philosophy of Race |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2024 |
Keywords
- coloniality of gender
- decolonial feminism
- intersectionality
- social contract theory
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Anthropology
- Philosophy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Colonial Contract and the Coloniality of Gender: Decolonial Feminist Reflections on Charles Mills's Racia-Sexual Contract'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS