The centrality of practice to evaluation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

There is a strong tendency for evidence-based approaches to social practices to view these practices as imperfect devices for delivering social services. Practices are regarded as in need of repair by evaluation (and research) that can deliver the necessary science-based solution to the problems of practice. This article presents a different view of practices as material and linguistic events in which activities and relationships are constituted and unfold in interaction and in which people change and develop, and it argues for restoring this view of practice to evaluation. The article discusses two different ways in which notions of evidence based, practice, and evaluation are related and suggests what a genuinely practice-oriented approach to evaluation entails.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)95-105
Number of pages11
JournalAmerican Journal of Evaluation
Volume26
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2005

Fingerprint

evaluation
Evidence-Based Practice
Linguistics
Social Work
Equipment and Supplies
Evaluation
Centrality
mobile social services
evidence
linguistics
event
interaction
science
Social services
Social practice
Repair
Interaction
Evidence-based
Evidence-based practice

Keywords

  • Evidence based
  • Practical knowledge
  • Practice
  • Science based

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Strategy and Management
  • Social Psychology
  • Education
  • Health(social science)
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

The centrality of practice to evaluation. / Schwandt, Thomas A.

In: American Journal of Evaluation, Vol. 26, No. 1, 01.03.2005, p. 95-105.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{199f184419374e91834ccebef4b24549,
title = "The centrality of practice to evaluation",
abstract = "There is a strong tendency for evidence-based approaches to social practices to view these practices as imperfect devices for delivering social services. Practices are regarded as in need of repair by evaluation (and research) that can deliver the necessary science-based solution to the problems of practice. This article presents a different view of practices as material and linguistic events in which activities and relationships are constituted and unfold in interaction and in which people change and develop, and it argues for restoring this view of practice to evaluation. The article discusses two different ways in which notions of evidence based, practice, and evaluation are related and suggests what a genuinely practice-oriented approach to evaluation entails.",
keywords = "Evidence based, Practical knowledge, Practice, Science based",
author = "Schwandt, {Thomas A}",
year = "2005",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1098214004273184",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "95--105",
journal = "American Journal of Evaluation",
issn = "1098-2140",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The centrality of practice to evaluation

AU - Schwandt, Thomas A

PY - 2005/3/1

Y1 - 2005/3/1

N2 - There is a strong tendency for evidence-based approaches to social practices to view these practices as imperfect devices for delivering social services. Practices are regarded as in need of repair by evaluation (and research) that can deliver the necessary science-based solution to the problems of practice. This article presents a different view of practices as material and linguistic events in which activities and relationships are constituted and unfold in interaction and in which people change and develop, and it argues for restoring this view of practice to evaluation. The article discusses two different ways in which notions of evidence based, practice, and evaluation are related and suggests what a genuinely practice-oriented approach to evaluation entails.

AB - There is a strong tendency for evidence-based approaches to social practices to view these practices as imperfect devices for delivering social services. Practices are regarded as in need of repair by evaluation (and research) that can deliver the necessary science-based solution to the problems of practice. This article presents a different view of practices as material and linguistic events in which activities and relationships are constituted and unfold in interaction and in which people change and develop, and it argues for restoring this view of practice to evaluation. The article discusses two different ways in which notions of evidence based, practice, and evaluation are related and suggests what a genuinely practice-oriented approach to evaluation entails.

KW - Evidence based

KW - Practical knowledge

KW - Practice

KW - Science based

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=14744278067&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=14744278067&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1098214004273184

DO - 10.1177/1098214004273184

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:14744278067

VL - 26

SP - 95

EP - 105

JO - American Journal of Evaluation

JF - American Journal of Evaluation

SN - 1098-2140

IS - 1

ER -