The case for message passing on many-core chips

Rakesh Kumar; Timothy G. Mattson; Gilles Pokam; Rob Van Der Wijngaart

doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-6460-1_5

The case for message passing on many-core chips

Rakesh Kumar, Timothy G. Mattson, Gilles Pokam, Rob Van Der Wijngaart

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter

Abstract

The debate over shared memory vs. message passing programming models has raged for decades, with cogent arguments on both sides. In this paper, we revisit this debate for multicore chips and argue that message passing programming models are often more suitable than shared memory models for addressing the problems presented by the many-core era.

Original language	English (US)
Title of host publication	Multiprocessor System-on-Chip
Subtitle of host publication	Hardware Design and Tool Integration
Publisher	Springer
Pages	115-123
Number of pages	9
ISBN (Print)	9781441964595
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6460-1_5
State	Published - 2011

ASJC Scopus subject areas

General Engineering

Online availability

10.1007/978-1-4419-6460-1_5

Library availability

Discover UIUC Full Text

Cite this

@inbook{c1ecf9e18398462e95fc3d9b53e5ea60,

title = "The case for message passing on many-core chips",

abstract = "The debate over shared memory vs. message passing programming models has raged for decades, with cogent arguments on both sides. In this paper, we revisit this debate for multicore chips and argue that message passing programming models are often more suitable than shared memory models for addressing the problems presented by the many-core era.",

author = "Rakesh Kumar and Mattson, {Timothy G.} and Gilles Pokam and {Van Der Wijngaart}, Rob",

year = "2011",

doi = "10.1007/978-1-4419-6460-1_5",

language = "English (US)",

isbn = "9781441964595",

pages = "115--123",

booktitle = "Multiprocessor System-on-Chip",

publisher = "Springer",

address = "Germany",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - The case for message passing on many-core chips

AU - Kumar, Rakesh

AU - Mattson, Timothy G.

AU - Pokam, Gilles

AU - Van Der Wijngaart, Rob

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - The debate over shared memory vs. message passing programming models has raged for decades, with cogent arguments on both sides. In this paper, we revisit this debate for multicore chips and argue that message passing programming models are often more suitable than shared memory models for addressing the problems presented by the many-core era.

AB - The debate over shared memory vs. message passing programming models has raged for decades, with cogent arguments on both sides. In this paper, we revisit this debate for multicore chips and argue that message passing programming models are often more suitable than shared memory models for addressing the problems presented by the many-core era.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84884521771&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84884521771&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-1-4419-6460-1_5

DO - 10.1007/978-1-4419-6460-1_5

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84884521771

SN - 9781441964595

SP - 115

EP - 123

BT - Multiprocessor System-on-Chip

PB - Springer

ER -

The case for message passing on many-core chips

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Online availability

Library availability

Related links

Fingerprint

Cite this