TY - JOUR
T1 - The Application of Family Stress Model to Investigating Adolescent Problematic Behaviors
T2 - The Moderating Role of Assets
AU - Chen, Jun Hong
AU - Huang, Chieh Hsun
AU - Wu, Chi Fang
AU - Jonson-Reid, Melissa
AU - Drake, Brett
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
PY - 2024/3
Y1 - 2024/3
N2 - The Family Stress Model framework proposes that household income can influence child and youth development through caregiver psychological distress. While prior studies have observed stronger associations among households with lower income, the role of assets has been ignored. This is unfortunate, as many existing policies and practices that intend to improve child and family well-being are focused on assets. The purpose of this study is to clarify whether asset poverty moderates the direct and indirect effects of paths linking household income, caregiver psychological distress, and adolescent problematic behaviors. Using the 2017 and 2019 Panel Study of Income Dynamic Main Study and 2019 and 2020 Child Development Supplements, we find that the family stress processes consisting of household income, caregiver psychological distress, and adolescent problematic behaviors are less intensive for families with more assets. These findings not only add our knowledge of FSM by taking account the moderating role of assets but also advance our understanding that assets can benefit child and family well-being through alleviating family stress processes.
AB - The Family Stress Model framework proposes that household income can influence child and youth development through caregiver psychological distress. While prior studies have observed stronger associations among households with lower income, the role of assets has been ignored. This is unfortunate, as many existing policies and practices that intend to improve child and family well-being are focused on assets. The purpose of this study is to clarify whether asset poverty moderates the direct and indirect effects of paths linking household income, caregiver psychological distress, and adolescent problematic behaviors. Using the 2017 and 2019 Panel Study of Income Dynamic Main Study and 2019 and 2020 Child Development Supplements, we find that the family stress processes consisting of household income, caregiver psychological distress, and adolescent problematic behaviors are less intensive for families with more assets. These findings not only add our knowledge of FSM by taking account the moderating role of assets but also advance our understanding that assets can benefit child and family well-being through alleviating family stress processes.
KW - Adolescent problematic behavior
KW - Assets
KW - Caregiver psychological distress
KW - Family Stress Model
KW - Income
KW - Random intercept multi-group path analyses
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85153769328&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85153769328&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10834-023-09902-2
DO - 10.1007/s10834-023-09902-2
M3 - Article
C2 - 37360657
AN - SCOPUS:85153769328
SN - 1058-0476
VL - 45
SP - 174
EP - 183
JO - Journal of Family and Economic Issues
JF - Journal of Family and Economic Issues
IS - 1
ER -