The appeal of the brain in the popular press

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Since the advent of human neuroimaging, and of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in particular, the popular press has shown an increasing interest in brain-related findings. In this article, I explore possible reasons behind this interest, including recent data suggesting that people find brain images and neuroscience language more convincing than results that make no reference to the brain (McCabe & Castel, 2008; Weisberg, Keil, Goodstein, Rawson, & Gray, 2008). I suggest that part of the allure of these data are the deceptively simply messages they afford, as well as general, but sometimes misguided, confidence in biological data. In addition to cataloging some misunderstandings by the press and public, I highlight the responsibilities of the research scientist in carefully conveying their work to the general public.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)762-766
Number of pages5
JournalPerspectives on Psychological Science
Volume5
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2010

Fingerprint

Brain
Cataloging
Neurosciences
Neuroimaging
Language
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Research

Keywords

  • Fmri
  • Media
  • Neuroscience
  • Public

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

The appeal of the brain in the popular press. / Beck, Diane M.

In: Perspectives on Psychological Science, Vol. 5, No. 6, 01.11.2010, p. 762-766.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5edefb58baca4405bfb0dd4695f833f2,
title = "The appeal of the brain in the popular press",
abstract = "Since the advent of human neuroimaging, and of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in particular, the popular press has shown an increasing interest in brain-related findings. In this article, I explore possible reasons behind this interest, including recent data suggesting that people find brain images and neuroscience language more convincing than results that make no reference to the brain (McCabe & Castel, 2008; Weisberg, Keil, Goodstein, Rawson, & Gray, 2008). I suggest that part of the allure of these data are the deceptively simply messages they afford, as well as general, but sometimes misguided, confidence in biological data. In addition to cataloging some misunderstandings by the press and public, I highlight the responsibilities of the research scientist in carefully conveying their work to the general public.",
keywords = "Fmri, Media, Neuroscience, Public",
author = "Beck, {Diane M.}",
year = "2010",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1745691610388779",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "762--766",
journal = "Perspectives on Psychological Science",
issn = "1745-6916",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The appeal of the brain in the popular press

AU - Beck, Diane M.

PY - 2010/11/1

Y1 - 2010/11/1

N2 - Since the advent of human neuroimaging, and of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in particular, the popular press has shown an increasing interest in brain-related findings. In this article, I explore possible reasons behind this interest, including recent data suggesting that people find brain images and neuroscience language more convincing than results that make no reference to the brain (McCabe & Castel, 2008; Weisberg, Keil, Goodstein, Rawson, & Gray, 2008). I suggest that part of the allure of these data are the deceptively simply messages they afford, as well as general, but sometimes misguided, confidence in biological data. In addition to cataloging some misunderstandings by the press and public, I highlight the responsibilities of the research scientist in carefully conveying their work to the general public.

AB - Since the advent of human neuroimaging, and of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in particular, the popular press has shown an increasing interest in brain-related findings. In this article, I explore possible reasons behind this interest, including recent data suggesting that people find brain images and neuroscience language more convincing than results that make no reference to the brain (McCabe & Castel, 2008; Weisberg, Keil, Goodstein, Rawson, & Gray, 2008). I suggest that part of the allure of these data are the deceptively simply messages they afford, as well as general, but sometimes misguided, confidence in biological data. In addition to cataloging some misunderstandings by the press and public, I highlight the responsibilities of the research scientist in carefully conveying their work to the general public.

KW - Fmri

KW - Media

KW - Neuroscience

KW - Public

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79955437114&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79955437114&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1745691610388779

DO - 10.1177/1745691610388779

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:79955437114

VL - 5

SP - 762

EP - 766

JO - Perspectives on Psychological Science

JF - Perspectives on Psychological Science

SN - 1745-6916

IS - 6

ER -